The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kimikeltalk 03:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
... that the initial stance taken in disputes on Wikipedia, over deleting an article, can predict the result, due to the "herd effect"?
Source: Mayfield, Elijah, and Alan W. Black. "Analyzing wikipedia deletion debates with a group decision-making forecast model." Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, no. CSCW (2019): 1-26. See 13-14 "early voters"
ALT1: ... that the longest "edit war" sequence among disputes on Wikipedia involved 20 editors making 108 reverts of the article on Turkey's first president, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk? Source: Chhabra, Anamika, Rishemjit Kaur, and S. R. S. Iyengar. "Dynamics of edit war sequences in Wikipedia." In Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, pp. 1-10. 2020. see section 4.2 "Longest Edit War Sequence"
ALT2: ... that editors often line up in rival camps during contentious disputes on Wikipedia and the winning side typically cites encyclopedic policies to favor their biased viewpoint? Source: Morris-O'Connor, Danielle A., Andreas Strotmann, and Dangzhi Zhao. "The colonization of Wikipedia: evidence from characteristic editing behaviors of warring camps." Journal of Documentation 79, no. 3 (2023): 784-810. There are other sources on rival camps.
ALT3: ... that editors tend to exacerbate disputes on Wikipedia when they greet each during discussions, use 2nd-person pronouns, or take turns speaking? Source: de Kock, Christine; Vlachos, Andreas (April 19–23, 2021). "I Beg to Differ: A study of constructive disagreement in online conversations".
Comment: Timing -- I created this early in term for my presentation at Wiki Conf NA, even though I couldn't edit for three days due to religious reasons. So please forgive the late submission. I see various potential hooks, let me know what seems most appealing. Will do a QPQ, I now see that's required.
Created by ProfGray (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.
Overall: Pass with religious exemption (as explained up above) for newness criterion which exceeded the limit by several days. The nominator has addressed all copyedit concerns that I left on their talk page[1] with new revisions directly resolving the problems.[2] I have no real preference for any one of the hooks, so I will state my preference based solely on hook length, from short to long: first choice ALT0; seocnd choice ALT3; third choice ALT1, fourth choice ALT2. Good work.I left numerous comments on your user talk page about this article so I won't reinvent the wheel here. Besides the newness (religious exemption request), sourcing (cite needed tags), and minor issues (grammar), I think this could conceivably be salvaged for DYK if others don't have a problem with that. Of the four hooks above, none of them is as interesting as the golden nugget I pointed to on your talk page, and it's too bad you didn't use that as a hook, because it's fascinating. As for what we have here, I can't say I have a favorite or a preferred one, so if you can get the article in shape (and nobody objects to the newness exemption), we can move forward. I'm fine with letting someone else choose the hook because my preferred one isn't here.Viriditas (talk) 23:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)