Template:Did you know nominations/Convention of London (1861)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 14:58, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Convention of London (1861)

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that a French tailor's, a bootmaker's, a hotel-keeper's, a farmer's, a coach-driver's and a colporteur's claims were all embedded in the Convention of London that escalated into the French intervention in Mexico?

5x expanded by Lajbi (talk). Self nom at 10:54, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

• The hook is 216 characters long, well over the maximum 200. Mikenorton (talk) 18:21, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

• Rewriting that and leaving out 'French' would give

ALT1 ... that claims from a tailor, a bootmaker, a farmer, a coach-driver and a colporteur were all embedded in the Convention of London that escalated into the French intervention in Mexico?

which is well within the limit. Mikenorton (talk) 20:54, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

• My bad I didn't realized the length... I agree with your hook. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 11:14, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Went from 595 characters to 5528 characters on date nominated - easily 5x expansion. Hook is cited to source. This good to go - thank for your expansion and submission to DYK - sorry for the delay in reviewing it.

Secretlondon (talk) 04:26, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

• Note: striking out original hook for clarity (it was too long for DYK). BlueMoonset (talk) 05:14, 3 July 2012 (UTC)