Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Carbonaceous sulfur hydride

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Carbonaceous sulfur hydride

  • Comment:

Created/expanded by Footlessmouse (talk) and Graeme Bartlett (talk). Nominated by Footlessmouse (talk) at 04:36, 17 October 2020 (UTC). REVIEW:

Article is New enough (created);
Article is Long enough;
Article is Within Policy;
Hook fits desired Format Length and Prominence in article;
Hook Appeals to Wide Audience;
Hook is Cited & Neutral;
No Image;
QPQ status is unknown. Addressed
REVIEW First Pass: :
Thank you @GenQuest: please note, this was my first ever nomination and so I am exempt from QPQ, I am sorry for not putting that there. You can verify with the tool in the sidebar that says DYK check. I also have done 2 reviews, but I am saving those credits for later as I am exempt for now and I can only use them once. Thanks again!!! Footlessmouse (talk) 06:18, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Good to know. Good job. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 06:24, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
REVIEW Second Pass: Article ready.
  • (Edit conflict) Hello Footlessmouse, and welcome to DYK! This article needs a little attention before it will be ready for DYK. It needs an opening statement that is comprehensible to the layman before plunging into the technical details. The lead should summarise the main text. The last sentence of the opening paragraph needs a citation and you will need to remove the "working" tag. Otherwise, it meets the DYK criteria of newness and length. The hook facts are interesting and cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:22, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
  • @Cwmhiraeth: I believe I have addressed your concerns. I just expanded it from lead only a few days ago and forgot to include the intro bits into the detailed sections. I did not write the last sentence, I moved to talk page for now and hopefully original author can find a source for it when they are available. Thanks!!! Footlessmouse (talk) 06:50, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Thank you, it's looking better. Because it has received a tick, the nomination template will move to the "approved nominations" page, and in due course, someone will add the hook to a prep set and it will soon afterwards appear on the main page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:46, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote this, but am wondering if you mean to say synthesized compound rather than synthetic compound in the hook? Yoninah (talk) 23:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • @Footlessmouse: OK, thanks. But I wouldn't link it in the hook; it would create a sea of blue. Restoring tick. Yoninah (talk) 23:34, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Snider, Elliot; Dasenbrock-Gammon, Nathan; McBride, Raymond; Debessai, Mathew; Vindana, Hiranya; Vencatasamy, Kevin; Lawler, Keith V.; Salamat, Ashkan; Dias, Ranga P. (2020-10-15). "Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride". Nature. 586 (7829): 373–377. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2801-z. ISSN 0028-0836.
  2. ^ Service, Robert F. (2020-10-16). "At last, room temperature superconductivity achieved". Science. 370 (6514): 273–274. doi:10.1126/science.370.6514.273. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 33060340.
  3. ^ Castelvecchi, Davide (2020-10-15). "First room-temperature superconductor excites — and baffles — scientists". Nature. 586 (7829): 349–349. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02895-0. ISSN 0028-0836.
  4. ^ Chang, Kenneth (2020-10-14). "Finally, the First Room-Temperature Superconductor". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-10-17.