Template:Did you know nominations/Asus ZenFone 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 14:28, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Asus ZenFone 6

  • ... that the ZenFone 6 has a flip-up rear camera that doubles as a selfie camera?
    • ALT1:... that the ZenFone 6 was the first phone released by Asus after their 2018 mobile division restructuring? (Source: 1)
    • ALT2:... that the ZenFone 6's use of amorphous metal for the camera module casing resulted in supply constraints? (Source: 2 "Undoubtedly, we have some production issues with these ZenFone 6, and that is because we used a unique material, liquid metal.")
    • ALT3:... that Asus had to rename their ZenFone 6 for the Indian market after the Delhi High Court ruled the name violated a competitor's trademark? (Source: 3)
  • Reviewed: N/A; this is my first DYK nomination. Thanks!

Improved to Good Article status by 17jiangz1 (talk). Self-nominated at 06:45, 17 April 2021 (UTC).

  • The usual metrics check out (although I give pause to see a {{cn}} in something that just passed GAN), but I'm really not feeling it for either hook, and I don't know if there's a good hook to have here at all. They both feel incautiously close to advertising to put on the front page of something that trumpets free culture, ALT0 especially. Also, is a QPQ warranted here? Vaticidalprophet 15:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
The cn was addressed in the GA review as the line refers to the references in the prior sentences, but the references have now been duplicated to avoid confusion. I've added another hook that feels less promotional. I don't think a QPQ is necessary since I do not have any DYK credits as of now. --17jiangz1 (talk) 18:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • I'm still not sure about the hookiness of that hook and would be inclined to reject it, but considering participating in DYK apparently gets me personal attacks slighting my mental health, someone else can finish my current reviews. Vaticidalprophet 10:15, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
For what it's worth I think ALT1 is okay; ALT0 is probably suitable but I feel it's vaguely promotional. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:22, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Vaticidalprophet, how about "... that Asus had to rename their ZenFone 6 for the Indian market after the Delhi High Court ruled the name violated a competitor's trademark?" MeegsC (talk) 17:30, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
17jiangz1 is this hook okay with you? The reviewer approves it. MeegsC (talk) 22:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
I don't have any particular qualms with that. Vaticidalprophet 21:23, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Sure, I have no qualms about this hook alt. Thanks! -17jiangz1 (talk) 10:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)