Talk:Victorian era

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Victorian era article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 100 days

Victorian era has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 28, 2023	Good article nominee	Not listed
May 17, 2023	Good article nominee	Listed
August 26, 2023	Peer review	Reviewed
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 1, 2023. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that only 45 per cent of babies born in 1851 in Victorian-era* Liverpool, England, lived to be 20 years old?*
Current status: Good article

History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Victorian era was the UK Collaboration of the Fortnight for the fortnight starting on November 21, 2004.
For details on improvements made to the article, see Past Collaborations and History

There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Important".

word salad sentence[edit]

"The researchers found that the more difficult of words were in declining usage and a negative correlation between the use of such words and completed fertility."

This sentence, under Reading culture, is as close to a word salad as any I have found in a Wikipedia article. I have no idea even how to revise it for the original intention. Epl (talk) 12:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it. Nerd271 (talk) 14:30, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 August 2022[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The Image2 in the section ===Housing=== is not from Wetherby, West Yorkshire, but from St. Ives, Cornwall, so the caption needs amending from Working class life in Victorian Wetherby, West Yorkshire to Working class life in Victorian St Ives, Cornwall Pwrw7383 (talk) 11:01, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But the file name is bishopgate, and there is an area of Wetherby called Bishopgate. There is a street in St Ives in Cornwall called Bishopsgate, but that isn't the same. So why do you think it is St Ives? Sbishop (talk) 11:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image is from the Frances Frith Collection, its of Back Road East in St. Ives (https://www.francisfrith.com/st-ives/st-ives-fishermen-s-quarters-back-road-east-1906_56548)

Approximate Street view matches also, https://goo.gl/maps/ba8C2Fvksenuoqbs6

Only reference of that image being from Wetherby is from Wikipedia / Wikimedia Pwrw7383 (talk) 11:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Good one. Aaron Liu (talk) 23:44, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should the events section be deleted?[edit]

It is unusual for an article of this type and much of it is not sourced. Based on the archive concerns seem to have been raised about it in the past. Llewee (talk) 13:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should the sentence about the "professionalisation of scientific study" be rephrased?[edit]

"The professionalisation of scientific study began in parts of Europe following the French Revolution but was slow to reach Britain."

Britain had a period of extensive scientific research and studies in the 17th and 18th centuries through the Scientific Revolution. The Royal Society is the oldest continuously existing scientific academy in the world. It would have been better to clarify the term "professionalisation of scientific study" to give more context to the reader. Currently, the sentence feels too abrupt as an introduction to the section "Knowledge and Infrastructure". Inlin (talk) 20:44, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is fine the way it is. It means exactly what it says. It was not until after the French Revolution that scientists started to exist as a professional class. Before that, most scientists were either amateurs or part-time workers. Nerd271 (talk) 22:44, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inlin and Nerd271, I will take out the comment about Britain being "somewhat undeveloped in... initially science" from the lead of the article as their probably isn't enough evidence to warrant it.--Llewee (talk) 14:24, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Llewee: Good idea! Nerd271 (talk) 23:24, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]