Talk:2014 United Nations Security Council election

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2014 United Nations Security Council election article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving 2014 United Nations Security Council election was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 1 January 2015.

Wikipedia

International relations: United Nations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Wrong map (Sudan)[edit]

The map is wrong. It doest not reflect the partition of Sudan into Sudan and South Sudan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.77.129.66 (talk) 23:19, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Map : Lithuania's missing and Taiwan not in blue[edit]

The map should be corrected so that Lithunia appears in green and Taiwan (part of the PRC from the UN's point of view) in blue.--79.85.84.115 (talk) 22:28, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WIKIPEDIA STANDARDS GOING DOWN THE SINK

Not only the map inserted in this article has NOTHING to do with it, i.e. why is Chile in green here?? but also the article is biased and written - as more than often in Wikipedia- with a marked political and personal opinions style. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.244.10.81 (talk) 10:40, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]