Talk:Rami Ranger, Baron Ranger
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rami Ranger, Baron Ranger article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Contested deletion[edit]
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (Dear Jbhunley the following link http://www.zoominfo.com/p/About-Rami/1773194650 has cached contain from the website which is no longer available. and the following http://issuu.com/abpl/docs/britishpunjabi2013 has been published after this Wikipedia article. There is no justification for a deletion in any case. Wikipedia is an open source knowledge center and we are all working to provide information to everybody out there who might need this. If we are unhappy with anything we see we have the ability to make changes and to correct them. In any case your statement for reason to delete is wrong as I have stated above) --Hdarji (talk) 09:08, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)@Hdarji: Thank you. The first site is the real problem. It seems to be from www.ramiranger.com and is therefore likely to be the original source of the material. Wikipedia can not have material copied from another site, whether it is still up or not. We must have content written in the editor's own words. There are some narrow exceptions, see WP:COPYRIGHT. The subject may pass WP:GNG but at the very least the article needs to be re-written. JbhTalk 13:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)@Jbhunley: Thank you for your input. I will re write this article that may take some time.
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Rami Ranger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150618012504/http://www.asiantimesonline.co.uk:80/business/uk-business/ to http://asiantimesonline.co.uk/business/uk-business/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)