Talk:MormonTimes.com

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Mormon times)
Current discussions are had at: Talk:Mormon Times


The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Suggestions for improvement[edit]

Don't worry so much about dividing the article up into sections. This will be a stub at first, so it doesn't need sections. Instead, work on finding addtional citations in third party sources. Make claims and assertions of notability that can be verified. Dgf32 (talk) 20:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the article from Mormon times to Mormon Times (correct capitalization). Happy editing, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 18:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge MormonTimes to DMN[edit]

See discussion at Talk:Deseret Morning News#Merge MormonTimes to DMN. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 00:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

[moved comments]

Name[edit]

I noticed that "MormonTimes" redirects to this page. However, I was wondering, should this article be named "MormonTimes" with this page redirecting to that page. I realize this may be minor, but there is more to MormonTimes then just a website. This pages says "..and newspaper insert..". After all the website doesn't call itself "MormonTimes.com", it calls itself "MormonTimes".

Also, if you go to Category:websites, only one page includes the .com, so it seem that it's unusual and unnecessary.

Lastly, some filtering software (like my work) tags this page and prohibits viewing simple because of the .com title.

However, I don't know anything about this new website/insert to decide this.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 01:08, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well it's been four months (I've waited since I can only access this page at home). I'm going to do it.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 22:42, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.