Talk:List of Microsoft Visual Studio add-ins

This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-01-24. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment[edit]

Time to start a discussing site. :]

Someone removed the vs.php language addin? http://www.jcxsoftware.com/jcx/vsphp/home Tell me why this shall be removed, otherwise I add it again, ok? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.183.184.176 (talk) 01:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Item removal[edit]

Hi. I'm not certain why some of the add-ins were removed in a previous edit, so I reverted it. If this article is kept (I am currently trying to decide what my opinion on that matter is) then I do not understand why some links should be removed, unless the add-in is simply not noted anywhere other than its own site. Then again, I'll be looking around a bit more for sources, so I will see. :-) --Iamunknown 08:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this article is to exist, it seems foolish to not include a link to Microsoft's own maintained listing of plug-ins and extensions, which appears to be the most comprehensive on the Net and adds significant research quality to the article. It also serves as a credible reference for tools added to the article itself. If the link is going to be removed, a reason in the edit summary would be reasonable. Alternamke (talk) 19:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the WP:WTAF edits are made in error. Rather than remove the listed items, the items should be edited so as to remove red-linking. The article itself states "You can help by expanding it with reliably sourced additions" - those additions should not be removed if no article exists; the additions though should not be added in such a way that this page is a list of red links. Sean Echevarria (talk) 17:54, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page Should be Removed[edit]

Given https://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com and how outdated this page is, it should be removed. 96.95.227.49 (talk) 18:17, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]