Talk:July 12, 2007, Baghdad airstrike

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options to not see an image.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about the July 12, 2007, Baghdad airstrike. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about the July 12, 2007, Baghdad airstrike at the Reference desk. Please do not discuss the air strikes, the conduct of the war, or anything else not directly related to the article.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 12, 2010	Articles for deletion	Kept

A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on April 6, 2010.

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 12, 2013, and July 12, 2017.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iraq Low‑importance

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Middle East / North America / United States / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

United States: Military history

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 92 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Bolding[edit]

Bringing this here to discuss my edit after it was reverted. @KalHolmann: According to MOS:BOLD: "[Bolding] is also done at the first occurrence of a term (commonly a synonym in the lead) that redirects to the article or one of its subsections, whether the term appears in the lead or not." The term "collateral murder" is widely used to refer to the event, or at least part of it, and said term also redirects to this page. It's not exactly an alternative name, and it doesn't appear in the first sentence, so I see no reason for it to not be in bold. Most readers would be more familiar with the term than the current generic mouthful. Prinsgezinde (talk) 21:21, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Prinsgezinde: Thank you for explaining that. Yes, I see that you are right. I have reverted my own edit, restoring yours. KalHolmann (talk) 21:28, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Title Typo[edit]

Hello. Can someone correct the "airstrike" in the title, please? While the article describes multiple airstrikes, the article's title makes it seem that there was only one airstrike. Thank you in advance. L00fers (talk) 05:54, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There were many airstrikes in Iraq during 2007, but this article is about a specific set of 3 airstrikes. Airstrike is more specific. Although the article still needs to be moved because of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events). The title should only have the year without the specific date. 2601:80:8402:1AA0:0:0:0:4972 (talk) 04:17, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 July 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 20:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 12, 2007, Baghdad airstrike → Collateral Murder – Per WP:COMMONNAME, the name that WikiLeaks gave to this event is the most common one. PhotographyEdits (talk) 11:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How did you determine that Collateral Murder is the common name? Cambial — foliar❧ 21:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For example, when looking through Google Scholar, the results for "Baghdad airstrike" and "2007" or something results in < 100 results, "collateral murder" and "2007" results in > 1000 results. PhotographyEdits (talk) 12:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That only indicates that there are more mentions of the the phrase “collateral murder”; it doesn’t mean that the phrase is being used to refer to the airstrike itself, rather than the leaked footage of the attack. Cambial — foliar❧ 10:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is that you for real @Cambial Yellowing because we agree about a Wikileaks edit

And it doesnt mean its the right phrase for an encyclopedia entry or lookup. July 12 2007 Bagdad airtrike is exact, collateral murder could be anything

We dont name pages because of how popular the page name would be in search results Softlemonades (talk) 11:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The article appears to be about the strike itself, not the video. Calling the airstrike itself that would be applying a WP:UNDUE opinion to the incident. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The title of the video is a metonymy of the airstrike, but is the common name for the airstrike as well. PhotographyEdits (talk) 15:27, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with @Zxcvbnm Softlemonades (talk) 21:26, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Overly long and complicated lead[edit]

I've just edited the lead [1] to remove several long and poorly written sentences. It was totally unclear what these sentences were meant to convey and they certainly don't belong in the lead. If the writing is improved and the relevance clear they can be in the article body. -Darouet (talk) 14:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]