Talk:2014 Japanese general election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

this is all wrong

Individual colors?[edit]

The norm on past articles for Japanese elections seems to be -- in the results table -- to give the opposition parties all one color, and the government parties all one color. Should the parties be given individual colors? It makes little sense to group together ideologically distinct parties like the JIP and JCP. --4idaho (talk) 22:52, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Increase/Decrease[edit]

Someone just changed the math used for increases/decreases from the change over the last election to the change over what the parties had going into the election (I assume some people crossed the floor?). Is this legit? It doesn't reflect the change in will of the voters as a comparison of last election/this election would—and it changes the LDP's results from a negative to a postive (ちょっと怪しい, especially given it was an IP who did it. Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 07:51, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For the most part, it's always change as compared prior to the dissolution for seats, and from the last election for vote swings. –HTD 13:51, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--But if this is kept, PFG and People's Life would be a loss in seats. Either we make it consistent or we reverse it. 90.202.183.36 (talk) 14:04, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would like, and have seen for other articles, two columns: one comparing change to the last election, and another comparing change to the situation just before the election. Bondegezou (talk) 16:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Japanese general election, 2014. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Japanese general election, 2014. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]