Talk:List of PlayStation games in chronological order

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 September 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

view
watch
edit
history
shell
vg talk
alerts
purge

AfDs

Ghosts (Pac-Man) (8 participants)
Midnight.works (5 participants)
Revenge of the Killer Robots from Hell (3 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (3 participants)
International Hobo (1 participant)
Wally Scharold (4 participants)
Cake Mania (series) (2 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (17 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Sources[edit]

Could anyone point me towards any reliable sources for this. I've found plenty of sites online but it doesn't take long before I discover something that looks very fishy, just dead wrong and/or downright impossible. I mean, it's not like we're talking ancient history here, it's just ten years ago at the most, so shouldn't there be better records out there? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Djungelurban (talk • contribs) .

Isn't this another version of List of PlayStation games, with a different order? -- ReyBrujo 02:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, one could argue that but I've found that I personally have more use for a chronological list than a alphabetical one. Check out my contribution history and you'll notice how much work I've done on the Chronology of console role-playing games. Basically I'm just doing something that I believe is missing and that I'd like to see. Other people would argue that an alphabetic list is better and have no use for a chronological list, so they can't really replace each other. Also, the web is plagued by incorrect release dates and hopefully eventually this could work as an attempt at finding out when things actually got released. At the moment I'm only using web sources of course but I'm hoping that eventually we'll be able to find out how things really are. This can't be left to the respective game pages to deal with because a vast majority of the games released are not featured on Wikipedia yet. -- (Djungelurban 11:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I will nominate this article for deletion next week. If you don't want it gone, merge it with List of PlayStation 1 games. See List of Wii games for how you can make it so users can sort games by their release date. TJ Spyke 05:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pics[edit]

The be or not be of the pictures. I would argue that while they do also serve a decorative purpose, lists like these can get extremely boring to browse through without some color, they do also serve as a quick and simple overview of the consoles evolution. At the moment this isn't the case of course since it's far from complete (and probably inaccurate aswell since I've still not found particulary good sources anywhere). All of the years, except 1994 I think, has games left that needs to be entered. But you gotta start somewhere. They also help point out the most notable games in a much more prefered way of displaying just that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Djungelurban (talk • contribs) .

This article is just a list. The images are decorative, as they are not being used to aid critical commentary. ed g2s • talk 12:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Djungelurban, perhaps you can find (or make) a photomontage that contains all these images instead. That might be more acceptable than what you're suggesting currently? ~ Flooch 22:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Montages of copyright images should be avoided at all costs. ed g2s • talk 12:29, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I'm just gonna wait around until this is changed. Might take a few years but in due time the people that run Wikipedia will "realise" that the presentation matters, and that in a case like this pics really improve things. The thing that bugs me though is that they're making up crap reason for why they don't want us to add pics. If they just came clean and admited that the actual reason is to save bandwidth they I'd be fine with it. (Djungelurban 14:14, 28 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

2005[edit]

Kids Playground was NEVER released in any of PlayStation's markets (PAL (Europe/Australia/New Zealand)/NTSC (US/Japan/Brasil)) - preorders were bad and below the official 1005 pieces per game necessary as commanded by Sony.

Please correct this entry.

TraunStaa 13:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)TraunStaa 18th of April 2007[reply]

Amount of games[edit]

On the n64 page, it has the total amount of games. why cant someone show how ps1 games there are? On the ps1 page it says theres like 7000 games. I dont think there's THAT many games for ps1. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.233.100.129 (talk) 14:33, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

title changes to list of playstation games in chronological order[edit]

wikified the title. more appropriate for wikiepdia. as essentially this article is a list

Dead Page?[edit]

I've been looking for a decent, month by month release schedule for the PS1 and thought I'd hit paydirt here...

However, the list is very incomplete, and seems to have been a vanity page originally designed by someone in 2006 who then just gave up at some point.

Frankly it should be deleted, and I'm surprised it hasn't been. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.124.188.20 (talk) 12:02, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]