Talk:2015–16 FIS Alpine Ski World Cup

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Header and TOC Upgrade[edit]

I am offering an organizational update for the top part of the article page.

  1. Splitting the Race Calendar, a level 2 header, into separate Men and Women level 2 headers (they are currently 3 levels).
  2. That facilitates a TOC upgrade, limiting it to a level 2 only structure, which is much friendlier to use/view, without plunging severely down the page.
  3. I also elevated the TOC to topline so the section=0 narrative slides around it to the right.
  4. Updated the running narrative in section=0 too, so please do not arbitrarily UNDO ALL of my "suggested" changes after reading this.
  5. Also, I split the Event Key out into a flatter format, 2-high vs. 3-high.
Let us know if you like the proposed improvements, or not. –HacksawFW my edits 23:37, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Table Upgrade to Sortable[edit]

Women's data back pages are complete at 1 2 3 4 5 6
Cheers - –HacksawFW my edits
Ditto for the Men 1 2 3 4 5 6 –HacksawFW my edits

Lead[edit]

The lead seems a little too detailed and includes information which is better off suited for later in the article per WP:LEAD. Perhaps in a "Summary" section like is done in 2014 Alpine Skiing World Cup or a "Highlights" section like was used in this older version should be tried. The lead should only summarize key points which are discussed in more detail later on throughout the article and everything from the sentence beginning with " By late December, ..." belongs later in the article in my opinion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC) Fixed. --Tone 12:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC) Concur. –HacksawFW my edits 00:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tables of Competitions[edit]

Hi. Don't think you are correct with the number of competitions in some of them. For womens super-G, for instance, I think you are wrong by the number. Maybe you count one competition twice. And then, the total, it should be for men's and women's competitions together 84; but now you got 85. And then you have the mixed competion added to one of each gender, and that makes 86. Am I right? Furthermore, I am impressed of your detailed sites of each discipline. :) --Christian47 (talk) 03:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC) What's your fucking intentions? First.. you don't answer me in first palace... And then (but it's yours...).. Why do you eliminate the states of upstate mentions? --Christian47 (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, first of all - mind your language. That includes: profanity, english - North American, Queen's, or World English preferred. Please learn one of the three. Second, pay attention. When they cancel, then reschedule (or not), the running total bounces around and the combined gender numbers do as well. Things won't be set in stone until the end of March when the season is over. All we are doing is a daily head count of events as they vanish and/or reappear. Remember that CE (City Event) counts as a SL-alom event for both M&W's and that PG is a +counter for the GS men too. –HacksawFW my edits 00:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thank you for correcting an old man from Sweden about the language. But maybe I'm naive in trying to cooperate to make updating lists as clear as possible. Now I shortly just want to pay attention, if Giant Slalom not should be 10 instead of 11 events...? Kind regards/ --Christian47 (talk) 07:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And the Team Event at the end of the year finals adds a +1 to Gender totals W+M+Team(1), vis-a-vis 41+43+1=85. –HacksawFW my edits