Talk:Yotsuba&!/Archive 1

Ha ha, a spoiler warning for Yotsubato. --Eean 06:54, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Title

Shouldn't this page be listed under "Yotsubato!" or "Yotsuba&!", as one is the normally used (and accepted, and offical) translation of the title and the other is what it is liscenced under. They're both undoubtedly more well known than "Yotsuba To!"--195.92.168.175 01:11, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

I think the title makes sense as it is (a sort of a compromise between a full translation and the original title), but I doubt it'd be a big deal to switch it around. It doesn't much matter as long as they redirct correctly, and right now they all point here. --Dirk Gently 20:15:52, 2005-08-30 (UTC)

The title makes sense, but it still isn't really right. It should be either the generally accepted title and translation (Yotsubato!, 5310 Google Hits as opposed to Yotsuba To!, 3110 Google Hits) or the official title Yotsuba&!.--Oppolo 22:28, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Requested move

Translation of title, how it is being published as and what it is liscenced under. Alternatively, Yotsubato! should be used (as this is the official version and how the manga origonal title is "most commonly known", note that Yotsubato! has more google hits than Yotsuba To!- almost twice as many). Not hugely controvertial, but I'm too new.--Oppolo 22:41, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

---

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

• Support -- Sure, makes sense to me. --Dirk Gently 22:16:01, 2005-08-31 (UTC)

This article has been renamed after the result of a move request. I have moved this to Yotsubato! as the naming conventions discourage the use of unusual symbols, like "&", in article titles and most of the comments here seem to regard Yotsubato! as an equally acceptable alternative. Dragons flight 07:05, September 10, 2005 (UTC)

Discussion

I wonder if it would be possible to somewhat redo this article into more of a series profile now that more of it has been released in English. I would like to add more details on the characters in partciular, particularly the Ayase sisters, Jumbo and Koiwai-san. A note about the Jumbo/Asagi dynamic would be especially useful to this article, as well as Fuuka's strange symbiotic relationship with the Koiwai family. Michael Hopcroft

The article says that the manga was released in America starting in 2005 but a search of the ADV Manga site [[1]] returns no such results. What gives? Xyzyxx 15:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

ADV Manga doesn't update their site too much. If ever. And if they did, they apparently still haven't added Yotsuba&! to their list. Anyway, it has been released by ADV, look it up in Amazon [2] for more information. --TcDohl 23:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

I have heard some interesting fan speculation about Ysotuba-chan's origins which, although it is not nealry firm enough to consider mentioning in the main article, I shall file away for future reference. Hopefully we can find the sort of up-front compromise that will prevent the hassles that have surrounded the Azumanga Daioh article's treatment of similar questions.Michael Hopcroft 03:40, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

"Delay In North America" (temporarily removed from article)

"Yotsuba&! fans may have noticed that their have been a lack of volumes of 4 and 5 in North America. Rumors go on saying the manga division of ADV (the American distrubutor of Yotsuba&!) was shut down. This information is false. When given a call to ADV Manga, staff will answer your call. One caller gave a question about Yotsuba's remaning time in America. The represenative's response was due to the fact that ADV Manga is still undergoing major translations for other well-known manga (ex. Chrono Crusade). The same represenative also stated that once finished with other books, they will work on more 'episodic' works (including Yotsuba&!). Yotsuba&! is still ongoing, even in North America, however there is no exact date to where we see the 4th volume of Yotsuba&!." --Elk 07:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

My personal feeling is that this could be cleaned up and reinserted if the assertions are toned down significantly, and the whole passage is given a more neutral, third-person perspective. For example:

"A sizable number of Yotsuba&! fans in North America has noticed that volumes 4 and 5 of the series have yet to be published in English, even though volume 3 was released in English in October 2005, and the fourth volume was already available in Japan by that time. Rumors have included speculation that Yotsuba&!, similar to a number of other ADV Manga titles, may have been put on "permanent hold." An ADV manga representative countered this claim, suggesting instead that due to a number of high-profile licenses, more "episodic" works (including Yotsuba&!) were currently on the backburner, but would resume at a later date. Exactly when this might be, however, is currently unknown."

--Julian Grybowski 17:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

I agree that the topic is somewhat significant but in need of editing. Great revision on Julian's part.

--Skaijo 2:10, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

ADV has said that the series may resume in Q1 2007.--Omnisentry 00:54, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

O_o; as if it matters....

As if it honestly DOES matter xD I LOVE Yotsuba&! It is the most awesome manga EVER and I LOVE Yotsuba; if I EVER get stuck with a kid, I swear to GOD it better be a girl, and she better be like Yotsuba!! xD AISHITERU YOSTUBATO!

That's fantastic. Thanks so much for that. (Would it be rude to point out that Wikipedia talk pages are not fan messageboards?) ShizuokaSensei 16:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

STFU NOOB! LOLOLOLOLOLOL DUNT POST HERE NO MOAR KEKE? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.2.37.199 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 8 June 2007

It seems that the purpose of an article's talk page escapes you, as well. (Not to mention the fact that the situation was dealt with nearly a year ago.) Please do not type anything here unless you have something relevant to add to discussion about the article, or if you have a genuine dispute with another editor (or editors) with regards to article content that needs to be resolved. Flames directed at other users are not tolerated here, even if they "had it coming to them" in your eyes. --Julian Grybowski 22:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps it "escapes" you that Yotsuba is what wiki calls "an ongoing gag" on 4chan. I wouldn't even bother telling them to stop. Mightywayne 21:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

PS: lol escapes

I am well aware of such, but regardless of Yotsuba's status on 4chan, 4chan-esque behavior on Wikipedia cannot be tolerated. --Julian Grybowski 23:10, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Splitting article

Anyone opposed if I split out the Volumes and Chapters into their own article, probably List of Yotsuba&! chapters? The list is just gonna keep growing. Omnisentry 07:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

I think that's a good idea. --Squilibob 04:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Looks like there's no problems, done. See List of Yotsuba&! chapters for all your chaptering needs. Omnisentry 23:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Fuuka/Fuka

I've run through and changed Fuka to Fuuka where appropriate (as it is closest to the original Japanese), and added an explanation to her character profile. I suggest that we try and stick to the Fuuka spelling to avoid confusion. Of course the counter argument is that Fuka is what's in the American release which most will see, whatever. Let's just try and stick with one spelling. --220.253.94.20 11:59, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Wouldn't "Fūka" be the best? (Sad to say I've never seen the US ver, only the JP)--sin-man 10:12, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Pulling up the Manual of Style (Japanese Names) seems as if we're supposed to use the official English name where possible, and only use macrons when all other options are exhausted. Which would make Fuka the preferred spelling, as that's what is in the official English translation of the manga. Omnisentry 01:03, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

So I went and did it. "Fuuka" is now "Fuka". Her individual page, Fuuka Ayase, is still with two Us until we decide to move it or not. I whacked a redirect from Fuka Ayase for the moment anyway. - Omnisentry 05:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

We should finish this process and move Fuuka Ayase to Fuka Ayase, leaving a redirect behind. —Quasirandom 16:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

And I've done that -- we are all now Fuka. Er, are all using that spelling of her name, I mean. —Quasirandom 20:56, 28 June 2007 (UTC)