Talk:War Zone C

Vietnam Mid‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / North America / Southeast Asia / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force
	United States military history task force

Pritzker Military Library Mid‑importance

	This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

On 13 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from War zone C to War Zone C. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 13 October 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

War zone C → War Zone C – The official wartime form of the name, and the one used always everywhere in every source. 5.173.41.12 (talk) 22:00, 13 October 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 01:36, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This does seem to be overwhelmingly capitalized, from the first few page of Google Scholar results and ngrams. Adumbrativus (talk) 04:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Recent Revert Discussion[edit]

Regarding this

So, when I see notes and references, it doesn't seem consistent to me. Maybe I'm wrong. DarklitShadow (talk) 17:55, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DarklitShadow What are you saying? The page is referenced. What is unreferenced that you believe needs to be fixed and which justifies the tag? You seem to tag a vast number of pages, but make little effort to fix the "problems" you have identified. That is Wikipedia:Tag bombing. Mztourist (talk) 03:06, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When I see something with notes and references I get confused about lack of standardization. Is it correct (or incorrect) to have two separate source sections?

DarklitShadow (talk) 19:42, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Its not how I would do it, but we are all bound by WP:CITEVAR. Just because you get confused doesn't mean it requires tagging, rather you should start a discussion on the relevant Talk Page. Mztourist (talk) 03:26, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]