Talk:WJHP-TV

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 02:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that one of the "plushest" nightclubs in northern Florida turned into studios for a TV station in Jacksonville? Source: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1401209189 or https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-BC/BC-1953/BC-1953-10-19.pdf
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/DellaXOZ
- Comment: Would be my 700th DYK

Moved to mainspace by Sammi Brie (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 687 past nominations.

Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, @Sammi Brie:, I'll be reviewing this

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Everything checks out, an interesting choice of word (from the cited pub;and I have no issue with it), but they've also used the term lavish in there. But can toning it down a bit for the gullibility of a wider audience be considered? Like, rewriting it using one of the more known synonyms instead, such as "luxurious"? Let me know your opinion. PS: I've done some minor copy editing, but overall it's nicely written. And congrats on your 700th. X (talk) 06:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

- @Xoak: I'm not comfortable rewriting a quote to distance it from the source in this case. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Approved.

Local programming[edit]

Putting this note here. The original version of this article lacks much info about local programming, and that's because I figure it was deliberately undercovered by The Florida Times-Union. I struggled to find anything substantial. At the time, it was still competing with the Jacksonville Journal, which owned WJHP-TV (The Times-Union bought the Journal in 1959). I suspect the Journal would have much more detail on 36's programming, but alas, it's not digitized as of May 2024. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]