Jump to content

Talk:Unparished area

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

format?

[edit]

how does this look as a format? i'm pondering recasting it in terms of ceremonial counties of England once i'm done (but then that does have the stockton problem) : perhaps better left as-is? the scheme ceremonial counties but with cleveland (and possibly avon) has certain merits but i don't want to do that. Morwen - Talk 15:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it makes sense to use the 1974 counties as that is where they were when they became "unparished". You could put a note under those ones that have changed counties (Avon, Humberside, Hereford & Worcester). You could just list the districts alphabetically, of course, and leave the counties out of it..Lozleader 20:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
But the districts have renamed and merged lots - i suppose using the current districts would make sense. Once I'm all done, I think maybe... Morwen - Talk 22:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

complete list

[edit]

this was generated by taking the list of UDs and boroughs from List of rural and urban districts in England and deleting the entries from the list at successor parishes! note i am ignoring the 5 split ones (e.g Billinge Chapel End, Lakes)

That looks great. What about the county boroughs? Could they contain parishes? Warofdreams talk 04:58, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
no county boroughs initially contained parishes, and none of them became successor parishes either (at the time they were looking at a max population of about 25,000 for a parish it appears). i'll slowly work on turning the list above into tables as in the article. It's a shame the SIs to create new parishes aren't actually listed in the bound volumes : they are considered 'local' and only mentioned by name. Morwen - Talk 06:14, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category for unparished areas?

[edit]

Is there a category for unparished areas, or if not, would it be useful to have one? DuncanHill 10:25, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

recent additions

[edit]

the idea is to list unparished areas in 1974, and then parishes created in these since. it is not intended to list every single parish in urban boroughs: we have a perfectly good List of civil parishes in Greater Manchester which does this. adding stuff like Ringway makes a nonsense of the purposes of the list. 83.146.2.234 11:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I realise now the purpose of the Parished? column. It’s for places which have been parished since 1 April 1974, not actually created on or before that date. It seems there is some disambiguation with this and should be made more clearer. Perhaps the column title to be slightly altered to Parished since 1974?, and may be a List of civil parishes in .... link at the end of each county section. Cayden (talk) 15:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccuracies

[edit]

There is a civil parish of Congleton. I'm not sure when it was established (or re-established). see here, in the section named "Town Councils"). Unless I am mistaken about what the list is supposed to show, Congleton should be removed from it.

Additionally, Chester (the central city part) is unparished, bar an anomalous small area Chester Castle (parish) in the middle of it As far as I know, it remained unparished from at least 1974, and possibly prior to that. It should be added to the list. To verify its unparished nature is a bit more tricky and time-consuming, but it can be done if so desired. Let me know.  DDStretch  (talk) 12:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently you are very mistaken.
The former county borough of Chester is listed as an 'unparished area' already.
The town of Congleton is not mentioned on the list at all - we note though that the entire Congleton (borough) has never contained any unparished area. 83.146.2.234 14:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies, I wasn't clear. I was referring to the list provided in this talk page, near the top of the page (section 1 at the moment). I agree that the article itself is correct. Sorry for the confusion.  DDStretch  (talk) 15:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
...but that was just my working list when I drew up this originally. may as well go to user subpages of working drafts and complain they're not up to date! 83.146.2.234 15:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Having examined it more closely, I believe that it in fact the list above there is correct with respect to Congleton. it seems the Congleton entry on the actual page has been altered to make it seem Congleton was never unparished : successor parish doesn't list it, and I'm pretty certain I got that 100% accurate, so it seems like an error by whoever was "helping" (like whoever has been messing up the Greater Manchester entries). I don't have access to the original sources to re-check though. I'm going to restore it to the way I had it originally here, unless someone can state definitely that this is wrong.
Ah, that would you you, then. The 'ince' stuff is nonsense there as well. 83.146.2.234 15:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure Congleton (former municipal borough) was originally unparished: the town council had been established by 1982, when The Local Authorities (Armorial Bearings) Order 1982 (1982 No. 708) transferred the borough arms over. Haven't been able to find out when the parish was established though. Lozleader 15:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok - my mistake. Thanks for sorting it out.  DDStretch  (talk) 15:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Congleton parish *might* date from 1975: there was a Borough of Congleton (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1975, quoted in this 1998 S.I. [1], which "abolishes the existing wards of the parish of Congleton and provides for the creation of six new wards". Dunno for sure. Lozleader 15:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, my apologies for this mistake a while back. It would have helped to label the list at the top of this talk page as being a working list which is now out of date. As a further explanation can I make a suggestion which follows on from User:Cayden's suggestion of more clear labelling of the article and the columns. That is what misled me. It might be an idea to rename the article to "Unparished areas at 1974 and subsequent changes" or some such thing.  DDStretch  (talk) 17:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it did say "This is a list of unparished areas as they existed on April 1, 1974." : but perhaps that's not clear enough?
Oh - I agree. But the title of the article seems to suggest its unparished areas at any time, which is why I added them, having read the sentence previously and having had it slip my mind momentarily, as happens to everyone at some stage - no doubt such mistakes are made by even yourself at times. Please, I've apologized a number of times now, having admitted my mistake, no more twisting the knife, please.  DDStretch  (talk) 21:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When Congleton Parish was established

[edit]

Since there was some uncertainty about when Congleton civil parish was established, I emailed the Town Clerk about it (as I'd previously been in contact with him about other issues to do with the borough.) He emailed me back the Constitution of Congleton Town Council, which contains the information required. I include the relevant paragraphs below:

CONSTITUTION OF The District of Congleton was formed in April 1974 by the merger of 5 former urban and rural authorities, Alsager UDC, Congleton BC, Congleton RDC, Middlewich UDC and Sandbach UDC. The first election for the District Council being held in June 1973. The grant of a Charter was approved in May 1974 which gave the Council “Borough” status and authorised the office of Mayor as first citizen of the Borough.

The former Congleton Borough Council, abolished on 31st March 1974, had been responsible for the geographical area of Congleton Town, currently covered by the Town Council. It was a non-county Borough Council which served as a principal authority within a two tier local government system, sharing duties with Cheshire County Council.

Between 1974 and 1980, no formal “third tier” of local government was in place for the Town, however an informal body of former mayors lobbied for town council status.

Congleton Town Council was inaugurated in 1980, and took up its responsibilities in April 1981, to provide the local council tier of local government for the town of Congleton, serving approximately 28,000 residents. It exists to serve as a vehicle of local opinion; to provide an effective link between the local residents and council tax payers with the Borough and County councils; to express local feelings and interests and to keep watch on all developments within the Town. It has the statutory responsibility to examine plans due for consideration by the Borough Council as planning authority. It also manages a range of local services and facilities.

So, I consider it certain that 1980 is the year in which it was established. I'm not sure how this might be cited if that is required.  DDStretch  (talk) 17:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Responsibilities in Unparished Areas

[edit]

Hello,

is there anybody who could answer the following questions to somebody from the continent:

  • Who is in unparished areas responsible for issues civil parishes normally take care for (as described e.g. here)
  • If it is the next upper level council, which is in most cases the dictrict council, could a totally unparished area be described as another kind of Unitary Authority, although the term is technically reserved for a combination of district and county level, but here as a combination of district an parish level?
  • If it is the next upper level council, which is in most cases the dictrict council, how is it handled in partially parished areas? Is it possible, that district councilpeople from a parished location within that district can decide about any local issue of an unparished place, while councilpeople from an unparished place cannot decide about local issues in parished places?

Thanks for help anyway.

--Kallewirsch (talk) 05:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In areas where there is no parish council/meeting then the "parish level" powers and responsibilities are indeed performed by the next tier, usually the district council. This was the case before 1974, where urban district and borough councils had "parish" powers, in contrast to the situation in rural districts.
I think you have hit on a problem in the use of the term "unitary authority" which assumes that there only two tiers (county/district) whereas in fact there are three. There are quite a lot of unparished districts which still come under county councils.
As far as I understand it, in a district that is partially unparished it is the district council as a whole who exercise powers in the unparished areas. There are no statutory requirements or restrictions that limit decision making to concillors for that area. Some councils have introduced decentralisation with area committees, but they are not required to. The one exception is where there are charter trustees for an unparished area, where the membership is limited to district councillors elected for the area. Lozleader (talk) 12:26, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List by current counties?

[edit]

It would be good to have a list of current unparished areas by current county (rather than 1974 county) - it's quite difficult to identify from the list in the article which towns and cities do not have town/city councils.

The list also needs updating, e.g. St Austell, Maldon, Stroud, Andover, Malvern all now seem to be civil parishes with town councils (according to the relevant WP article or council website).--Mhockey (talk) 23:11, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean... it would nearly need to be a completely separate list showing the current ones, as I'm not sure how you could incorporate say Keynsham which was parished when it was in a different county than it is now. If you see what I mean. Also we have the problem of whether to use ceremonial or non-metropolitan counties where they differ. I think the 1974 ones were chosen because the unparished areas date from that reorganisation. Might be an idea to have an article "Unparished area" which is basically text explaining what they are and then one or two list articles??? Lozleader (talk) 22:17, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would suggest a separate list, leaving the present list in place (updated) to show the history of how we got here. I would use ceremonial county, which is how we categorise civil parishes (Category:Civil parishes in England by county). I would not include (in the new list) former unparished areas such as Keynsham - if you wanted to know about them, you would use the present history-based list.--Mhockey (talk) 08:41, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think a full-blown rewrite is needed based on current areas. I don't just mean using ceremonial instead of 1974 counties, but using current information to describe what the area actually is. Two examples:

  1. Manchester: The unparished area may have been the former borough, but its easier to describe today as the current borough minus Ringway CP
  2. Knowsley: There are two distinct unparished areas in the district - Kirkby and Huyton/Prescot. The current list doesn't even hint that they are separate areas.

The historical information should be brought fully up-to-date as well of course.--Nilfanion (talk) 17:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Market Harborough

[edit]

There indeed is an order in September 2021 about an area moving Lubenham to Market Harborough unparished area but it it possible there has been a decision to parish the unparished area since then? I can't find any and there doesn't appear to be a town council and "Market Harborough Town Council" only returns a few results. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:14, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Stortford: In addition to Mapit the OS says its a CP. I still can't fine any other evidence such as orders or a town council though. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's possible that it's been parished more recently than the September 2021 order, but in that case I'd expect to find evidence of committee reports on the subject at Harborough District Council and relatively recent media reports and quite likely a newly-minted town council website too - none of which are leaping out at me from a quick search. I also note that Ordnance Survey's [2]Election Maps website is still showing it as a "non-civil parish or community". Stortford (talk) 16:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed I'd expect to fine other evidence if a town of that size had been parished. On a related note some like Weymouth aren't parished according to the OS and Mapit (as well as election maps) and the OS and Mapit still show only the part from Cranford (part A on the order) with the original area still unparished. Probably time will tell but I think as with Kettering its just an error with the OS. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Stortford: I've been through Mapit again and the parish of Market Harboorugh has disappeared in both Mapit and the OS and Mapit appears to show the unparished area with the new boundaries following the order so it indeed looks like it was just an error. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:52, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kingston upon Hull

[edit]

Is it still true that the whole city is unparished as I am sure that somewhere I read that Sutton-on-Hull had recently become a parish. Keith D (talk) 15:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, I can't fine any evidence of orders etc for that and there's nothing in the OS or Mapit that shows it as a parish. Crouch, Swale (talk) 15:56, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Unparished_area&oldid=1209099908"