Talk:Unji (disambiguation)

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 November 2012. The result of the discussion was split to base-name redirect to Undzhi and this disambiguation page.

Disambiguation

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Untitled[edit]

unji unji :) It's not bad.

Speaking, wording, reading in a book.... Perfect! I think, it's just the koreanism. Right?

No, This word is used only a few of peoples. just used far-right netizens(for example, DCinside's or ilbe's members) --HeonKim (talk) 10:16, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

Whomever is blanking the page, please stop. This is not how you resolve whether or not an article should be deleted. Please discuss the deletion at the appropriate AfD space rather than vandalizing the article.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:26, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a nut? Tokyogirl79[edit]

I don't know whether Korean or not, you've just deleted the internet meme in Korea without any dicussion. Well, I'm not a huge fan of Wiki nor familiar with Wiki, it's not fair to erase the whole article and fill it with a bunch of unrelated contents like that. I also confess that I'm not well aware of enormous articles about deletion and Wiki rules; I should get used to them, though, beginning users like me should be frustrated with your crucial and dictatorial behavior. I desperately urge you that you should restore the original content of Unji!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.214.211.173 (talk) 08:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So far the consensus was to make this into a redirect. None of the other information had any sourcing to show that it was notable in the slightest, so there was nothing to keep. In any case, the article is more than likely going to end with all content being deleted and the page serving as a redirect to the town called Unji, so restoring it to the previous unsourced and unencyclopedic content serves no purpose. It's just going to get deleted anyway and again, it was all unsourced. I won't be restoring the previous version. There's no point to it. I don't really have to restore previous content if it isn't sourced. If anything, on Wikipedia we are supposed to remove unsourced content and anything that is non-neutral.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mean to sound rude, but I don't exactly have to restore unsourced and non-encyclopedically written content. I'd also like to say that phrasing your request in a nasty manner by calling me a "nut" and a "dictator" (and what I think is an attempt to call me cruel) is not exactly doing you any favors. I'd like you to read WP:CIVIL. Calling someone names is not a good way to ask for me to do something for you!Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:00, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]