Talk:Transatlantic cables incident

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / Russian & Soviet / United States / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Did you know nomination

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

USS Roy O. Hale underway in 1959

... that in 1959, seamen from the warship USS Roy O. Hale (pictured) boarded the Soviet ship M/V Novorossiysk in response to a report from AT&T?

Source: https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/chinese-registered-ship-is-held-in-baltic-sea-sabotage-investigation-27929472

, and Incidents at Sea: American Confrontation and Cooperation with Russia and China, 1945–2016

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Doori Land

Created by Chetsford (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 153 past nominations.

Chetsford (talk) 01:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Chetsford, great idea for an article. Review: created 21 November and exceeds minimum length; sources used look generally reliable (I am not sure about destroyerhistory.org but it is only used to cite the complement of the destroyer involved); article is fully cited inline; I don't have access to all the sources but didn't pick up on any issues with overly close paraphrasing in a spotcheck; Earwig score is high but only because of the quoted article form the convention (which is PD and appropriate); image is PD (source states from Department of Defense); I can't access the sources cited for the hook but it is stated in the article so I will AGF; QPQ awaited but otherwise looks good - Dumelow (talk) 21:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Dumelow - QPQ now done! (For Destroyer History - I did some research on it a couple years ago and posed a question at RSN [1]. It didn't get much interest/response, unfortunately.) Chetsford (talk) 22:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. I think the additional info you've provided at RSN helps demonstrate reliability - Dumelow (talk) 06:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]