Talk:Time's Champion

Doctor Who Low‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels: Sci-fi Low‑importance

	Novels portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by Science fiction task force.

Deletion

This book has already been failed to pass an AfD once. I'm not sure how its still around.Emoteag69 (talk) 19:44, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I found this page because the 'notability' template had been added to it, but it seems to me that this is the rare example of 'fanfiction' that actually is notable. It was adapted from an unfinished work by Craig Hinton and published as a book in its own right, presumably in cooperation with the British Heart Foundation. As the links show, it was reviewed by various sci-fi- and Doctor-Who-related media. I'd say it's actually as notable as the rest of the Doctor Who novel line. Hopefully this won't encourage people to start uploading articles about their own Doctor Who fanfiction, though... the vast majority of it shouldn't have articles, but this is an exception. Robofish (talk) 13:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I realise this is a reply to a comment from three years ago but I've just stumbled on this article. It's not clear from the article who published the book and that the book was reviewed (and by not particularly notable sources) does not imbue it with notability. There's no evidence on the page that the BHF was involved and this comes across as a self-published work. None of which is to say the book isn't notable, but I don't see the article asserting that notability and am going to retag it. Whouk (talk) 11:43, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chris McKeon published it himself. I do not think this passes notability standards. --50.136.94.201 (talk) 02:03, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Time's Champion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/news/cult/news/drwho/2004/06/01/13201.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]