Talk:Thinking

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Thought
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Thought

Psychology

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles

Philosophy

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Cognitive science Unassessed (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Philosophy[edit]

The word, and verb: 'Thinking' refers to the process of being in thought.

Hence should the explanation of the process 'Thinking' also be explained in a way

that gives us a more clear impression of what 'Thinking' is.

'Thinking' has little to do with the abstract notion of 'Thought', as 'Thought' is

a concept, a derivative conclusion formed by reason, and is further away from explaining

the process of 'Thinking', then giving, or, let us say, try to even grasp the idea of 'thinking'.

What we see here is an important philosophical issue. The question is; "What is more true?"

I am restoring the text on 'Thinking'(although it needs more work) it

still is a better notion of thinking than 'Thought'.

The text is written in terms of a phenomenological approach. I can see why that is causing a somewhat of indifference. It is possible to read f.ex. theorists like J. L. Austin, and maybe the text will be more meaningfull. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Do_Things_With_Words#How_to_Do_Things_With_Words

Now, let us continue the discussion. What is thinking? Hribers (talk) 22:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your statements appear to be original thought, something (surprisingly) not allowed on Wikipedia. If you have sources to your, um, thoughts, feel free to share them here. (as an aside, you don't really need those line breaks every ten words). ~a (user • talk • contribs) 02:01, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]