Talk:The dress/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ribbet32 (talk · contribs) 20:44, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
1a "Color" is used here and there in an article otherwise written in British English. Per WP:LQ, place punctuation outside of quotes.
1b Some repetition in lede. In first sentence, a "photo" becomes a "picture"- why not a "photograph" becomes a "meme"? The black-blue vs. white-gold explanation is repeated in first and second paras.
- Done
-
2a Thoroughly referenced, to generally fine sources.
2b
- Found sources for Chris Murphy's tweet, but removed per WP:DUE.
-
3a. Fairly broad coverage. Covers the history/meme/science aspects.
3b. Llamas seem a bit off-topic at first, but they're explained more later
4. I'm a little peeved the intro declares it's black and blue when clearly there's no black in that dress ;) But, whatever. Perhaps add "humorously" to the existential crisis bit in the Initial spread section. In Overnight popularity, it should also be noted the "Politicians, government agencies" comments were tongue-in-cheek. The beamled ref in Scientific explanations is a store's promotional website, and the point it's supporting isn't entirely relevant, so you can just delete that.
- Done
5. Aside from anon incompetence/petty vandalism, no edit wars affecting stability.
6. Images are free, with one attributed fair use. @Ribbet32: issues addressed. feminist 10:00, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Done Thank you for your quick response. Ribbet32 (talk) 16:52, 21 August 2017 (UTC)