Talk:The Story of Us (song)

The Story of Us (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 12, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taylor Swift Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives: 1

inspiration.

The article says "The song was released on April 19, 2011 by Big Machine Records, as the fourth single from Speak Now. Swift composed "The Story of Us" regarding the time when she encountered an ex-boyfriend of hers at the 2010 CMT Music Awards. At the event, the two attempted to ignore each other, which inspired Swift to compose the song." The ex-Boyfriend was john mayer. I read it in J-14 magazine. It was the May/June issue. So the Article SHOULD say "The song was released on April 19, 2011 by Big Machine Records, as the fourth single from Speak Now. Swift composed "The Story of Us" regarding the time when she encountered john mayer an ex-boyfriend of hers at the 2010 CMT Music Awards. At the event, the two attempted to ignore each other, which inspired Swift to compose the song." --Bella##Fan##262 (talk) 17:38, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:54, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Story of Us (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose (talk · contribs) 19:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Copyvio check: I reviewed matches over 5% using Earwig's Copyvio Detector. No issues. (Matches were attributed quotes, titles, etc.)

Media: FUR in place for cover image. Other image is CC. Images are relevant. Placement and captions are fine. Alt text is OK - optionally it could be made a bit more descriptive of what is shown image. As far as I'm aware, the 27-second song sample is OK per Wikipedia policies.

Y I edited the alt text. Ippantekina (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Background and release

"a collection of songs containing confessions she had wanted to but could not make to the people she had met in real life." - I was thinking about suggesting a rewording of the second half of this, but can you just confirm what parts of the source are being summarised here? (I'm not sure "confessions" is quite right if it's the answer that starts "Everything that happens to me gets put into a song...")

Y Reworded and added another source. Ippantekina (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"after which she proceeded to write the lyrics" - optionally, as a misreading of the lyric author would be unlikely, change to something like "and then proceeded to write the lyrics"

Y Done. Ippantekina (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Composition

"runs at four minutes and 28 seconds" - seems an unusual phrase to me, but happy to retain this if it's common in American English.

Y Ippantekina (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Some critics commented" - if it was the two cited, I'f name them and their publications. (e.g. "Both Matt Bjorke of Roughstock and Billboard's Brittany McKenna..." (For some reason I couldn't get to either the original or archived versions of these sources; I may try later)

Y Ippantekina (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

"In Speak Now album reviews, some critics" - optionally expand these but as a range of opinions are included in the paragraph, it would also be OK to leave this as-is.

I adhered to the advice given at WP:RECEPTION in that we don't have to name each and every critic. Hope it works. Ippantekina (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"his ranking of all songs" - useful to add the year, I think.

Y Ippantekina (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Live performances

"She performed" - better as "Swift performed" as this is the first mention in the section. (the current first "Swift" could then be changed to "she")

Y Ippantekina (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Music video

scarrittbennet.org isn't an independent source for the video being filmed there. Is there a better source? If not, can leave it as-is as it's not very controversial, unless I underestimate Swifities.

Y replaced as it is a primary source anyways. Ippantekina (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charts/Certifications

No issues

Infobox and Lead

If the exact date for the music video is included, I'd suggest including the full date for the release of Speak Now

Sources

No questions or concerns about reiability or from a couple of checks (other than anything noted above).

Thanks for your work on the article Ippantekina. I'm happy to discuss, or be challenged on, my comments. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, BennyOnTheLoose. I have responded above. Let me know if the article needs further work. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Ippantekina. I'm satisfied that the article meets the GA criteria, so I'm passing it. The inclusion of the full date for the release of Speak Now (per my comment on infobox and lead) isn't a blocker to GA status. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:52, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.