Talk:The Prodigy/Archive 1

Archive 1

Smack my bitch up

Oughtn't there be some mention of the controversy surrounding the "Smack my Bitch Up" song and video? 209.114.249.74 15:09, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I concur about about lack of mention of the song. I came from the "bitch" article hoping to find more about the song with no luck --Leonsimms 16:44, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

I think the article should point out that in the video all the violence (against men and women) was performed by a woman. 193.198.150.230 23:17, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

This section contains spoilers. The whole point of the music video is about how people stereotype, and it ruins it if the ending is spoiled.

Alli Maclnnes merge discussion

All other former live members of The Prodigy have their own page, plus I think that, seeing as she has/had another band, it would be unfair to clutter this article with more than a name-check. ◄ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ►

Errr NO, She is technically a band memeber and therefore the article about her (as it stands at the moment)should be included in the Prodigy acticle, however a more indepth article about her should be created just like the other memebers of the Prodigy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.96.45.154 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Are you suggesting the full text of every single member and former members' articles should be included here? ◄ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ►

No Newsmare, not the FULL text, just a brief version of that and then an article on them individually. But as her article is so small it might as well be totally included. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.96.45.154 (talk • contribs) 20:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Well, it's either totally included or it's not. You can't say "not the FULL text" and then say the article "might as well be totally included". Make a choice: merge or keep. ◄ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ► 23:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and expand biography article. Sulfur 05:55, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. I can't personally see where you would inject the relevant information. ◄ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ► 23:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand biography article. cun 23:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Genre, II

I'v edited the genre again, I surely have read the discussion, but it's plain stupid that people who have absolutely no idea about this start making edits.

A: The Prodigy's early releases are prime examples of RAVE music. This music genre is the predecessor of Happy hardcore, and anyone that knows what HH sounds like, should thus see the similarities.

B: Their genre has evolved through Music for the Jilted Generation and Fat of the Land, to BIG BEAT. Please, ask anyone that has some understanding of the bigbeat genre for an example artist, and you'll get either The Prodigy or The Chemical Brothers.

Sure, genres shouldn't be all that absolute, but The Prodigy are such clear examples, that we obviously don't need any goofs making edits such as 'techno' or 'electronica' These terms are just abused too much by those who don't have the slightest understanding of EDM and it's history. Sadly these people make up the majority of Prodigy fans nowadays...

I concur, they were massive on the rave scene and as that died off due to the CJB in '94, they were pigeon holed as big beat. Huge crossover appeal though, you'd regularly hear them at all sorts of different music events Orbtastic 20:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Is there not a case for simply not categorizing them, qualifying it with the fact that there have been so many categories that their music fits into, but no one category that defines them all? Either that, or list them all, with the remark that there are so many genres that apply, that fans and the band alike are unable to pigeon hole them. If someone asked me for a "BIGBEAT" artist, I would say Fatboy Slim. If you asked me what the Prodigy were I'd say Hard Dance, because I got into them at the No Good Start the Dance era. The UK doesn't really recognize Electronica as a genre.Andymarczak 08:41, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Hard dance isn't a genre, see Hard dance. And it doesn't mater how you feel about the prodigy, it is what they make. I agree that electronica is a to vague therm and should only be used if no more specific genre exists. I totally don't agree with the idea that the prodigy can be labeled as rock or any form of rock. I also fail to see how they can be labeled as Hardcore. And it's not rave, a rave is an event. The genre is called Rave music.

Articles about the singles

I've finally finished creating good foundation work in the articles about the singles by The Prodigy. Anyone has something to add? cun 14:00, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Rave

1992's album The Prodigy Experience was described as "It has the curious distinction of being the first album to be released by a rave act. At that time, dance music albums were thought to be a fruitless endeavour." What a load of bollocks. What about Orbital, The KLF or the Future Sound of London? PoV all of it, so I moved it here -Drstuey 15:27, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Orbital, The KLF or the Future Sound of London are all house/disco influenced bunch of wannabees electronic guys with some songs that :might hypnotize you but not be inside you forever

all of the original traks including up until mftjg was produced on Moog Prodigy by korg

Lol. Three of the most acclaimed acts in the history of British dance music (including Orbital, quite possibly the most acclaimed of them all) written off as "wanabees". And what's become of The Prodigy? A second grade Sex Pistols, that's what. Anyway, never mind that, the point is we strive for accuracy and neutrality. That said, I seem to recall a similar comment being made in the music press - probably NME - at the time. Quote that and it might be a different story. --kingboyk 11:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Bizarre Inc and Altern-8 both released decent rave albums before / around the time of the Prodigy's debut. And of course, Shut Up & Dance, possibly the creators of the breakbeat hardcore sound of the early 90s. User:DShamen 10:03, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes indeed. I've actually created an article on the Altern-8 album, Full On... Mask Hysteria should anyone care to beef it up. --kingboyk 11:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Split

A page full of a big list of albums and singles, based on timeline of release, would be awesome. Brief info on each with a link to each's own article for it too would be nice JayKeaton 10:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

I agree, its clogging the whole page. --Dr. Pizza 19:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes. They have too many singles to diplay on that page. It's needs its own.

A separate discography page would make sense, given the size of the present article.

Derek R Bullamore 23:15, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

UK vs England revert war

What's going on guys? Robogymnast 18:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh My God. That is some funky shit!

Fair use rationale for Image:Prodigy Ant-01.jpg

Image:Prodigy Ant-01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:The Prodigy Logo.png

Image:The Prodigy Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fan site

It's not a serious offender, but this page is turning into an over-long narrative (e.g. are the exact dates of releases at all relevant?). And it's starting to show characteristics of a fan site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrick Neylan (talk • contribs) 19:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Smack My Bitch Up Controversy: Move section to SMBU article

There's an article on the song Smack My Bitch Up which contains rather less information than is presented in the section of this article about the controversy. Let's move that whole section to the SMBU article. --131.193.179.146 (talk) 07:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[sic]?

From the article:

"HOW CAN THE GOVERNMENT STOP YOUNG PEOPLE HAVING A GOOD TIME. FIGHT THIS BOLLOCK'S."

Can we get a scan of the liner notes and see if that misplaced apostrophe at the end was really there? Rufous 18:43, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

I checked my copy (UK CD) and there's no apostrophe - I've fixed the article accordingly. StephenHildrey 17:20, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Though they misspelt "goverment" (sic)... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.7.237.14 (talk) 20:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

THE CASTBREEDER

Shouldn't we include in the article some facts about "The Castbreeder"? It was released near the end of 1998 and it was supposed to be a Prodigy album. However, it has absolutely nothing to do with the Prodigy (it mostly contains live versions of Junkie XL’s Saturday Teenage Kick album). For more info on this subject, take a look at the net, and especially at The Claustrophobic Prodigy Page

"It has absolutely nothing to do with the Prodigy" - I think you answered your own question there. I am now going to delete this pointless information. Solicitor1 16:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

'The Rev'

In the 'Former Live Members' section, the name 'The Rev' links to the current Avenged Sevenfold drum player. Either it's meant to refer to the former Towers Of London guitar player, also known as 'The Rev', or it should say "'The Rev' (drums)".

(I'm not actually sure which one of them played with The Prodigy, but seeing as Snell (who quit Towers Of London at the same time as The Rev) is mentioned as a former drummer around the same time, and it makes an allusion to the former TOL member's time in the The Prodigy on his new band's (DAY 21) wiki page, I think the former TOL guitar player seems most likely) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Will Storm (talk • contribs) 02:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

References

I forgot to sign my previous post adding the archived article. Julyo (talk) 12:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Another genre problem

I noticed that nobody has mentioned to add "rock music" to the genres or music that the Prodigy play, so I've added that into the genre section of their article. User:beno1000

It's unclear to me where you got the idea that the Prodigy play rock music. They really don't, and all I can think off is that you interpret the guita samples in Voodoo People as rock ? Please give us some arguments about this, because i fail to see what is "rock" about the Prodigy. (Punk vocal elements have been mentioned already, if that's what you're trying to say?) --Prodigital 13:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Rave, dance, and big beat are fairly safe genres to use and easily justified. "Punk" is arguable and a possible inclusion. "Techno", also borderline I think; I know there are tracks such as "One Love" and others on Jilted Generation which could fit that genre but they're also the last breaths of rave in a way, and it wasn't long before the Prodigy had moved on to their new sound (Fat of the Land onwards, I'd argue). As for rock - I really don't think so. Not as a primary genre. Of course they've dabbled with guitarists and rock sounds, but they've never been a straightforward rock band imho. Considering the infobox ought to contain the genres with which they are most closely associated, not every genre they've ever had a play with I think, there is a case to be made for restricting it to the first 3. --kingboyk 21:47, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Most people just seem them as rave/comedy rave in the early part and a cross of Rock/punk/dance later genres have no true definitions so just keep it simple yeah? Owwmykneecap 03:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I've seen them a few times over the last couple of years and everytime I've seen them they've incoroporated more and more live work into their sets. The recent performance at Donnington could well've been described as a rock act doing dance music, by the uneducated of course. The live sound does seem to becoming a lot heavier though.

The Prodigy as soon as they started to pander to the American rock market lost just about all their credibility in dance/rave circles in the UK...I mean the chance of hearing crap like Firestarter at a genuine underground dance club in England was about as likely as hearing a barber shop quartet despite the dance press in a desperate attempt to drag in casual rock fans kept putting all this rock/big beat/student techno rubbish (call it what you will) stuff on their covers. But did you ever hear it at a genuine dance club ...did you f**k! Prodigy purveyors of so many classic early rave tracks totally sold out with all this pretending they were a group/doing rock gigs (when it was always obviously just Liam Howlett) just to impress the rock bores).Surely this kind of stuff should feature in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.156.63 (talk) 23:21, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Genre

One of the biggest clues to Prodigy's genre is their movie ELECTRONIC PUNKS, a title and possible genre that defines The Prodigy more accurately than most given styles, considering their defiant attitude towards the law and possibly any authoritative figure in most of their vocal tracks, a distinct "punk" trait, ultimately created on electronic instruments with slight insinuation of real instruments such as guitars, drums, bongos, etc, which are mostly used for their live act, and not of their recordings.

Once again, someone is hastily editing the article for Prodigy's genre. They are NOT techno. Read the wikipedia article on Techno. Prodigy are nothing like it. They also are not punk, maybe the claim could be made they are post-punk, but they're not punk. And they WERE rave, they are not now. Right now they are Big-beat/electronica! If someone disagree, let's discuss it, instead of constantly editing the page.

"The Prodigy is a British hard dance/rave act" is rather ambiguous, especially since Wikipedia has a rather indepth categorization of electronic genres. Hard dance does not even have a page of its own. The term may very well be made up. Also, The Prodigy's original records may be an important part of the rave culture, but I do not believe it defines their act today very well.

---

The Prodigy are not Hard Dance or Big Beat, please refer to the relevant pages for information, i love the prodigy, as well as these two genres, im a bedroom dj, play Hard Dance, Breakbeat, and a bit of Big Beat. It is a misclassification"!"!!!!

J.M.Hunt (talk) 11:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Yet more annoying genre-change edits. This means that the genre is clearly POV, and we need to figure out a way to remove absolute genre references from the article. WMarsh 11:51, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Prodigy is definetly not "electronica". Liam Howlett have himself stated this. As for not being a rave act the fact that they still play their early rave tunes during make them a rave act. Look at http://www.nekozine.co.uk/prodigy/live/belgrade/belgrade.htm for a recent setlist. Note tunes like Out of Space, Their Law and No Good. As for hard dance being ambiguous, it is not. They definetly make dance music, and the music is harder than your average dance music. Therefor it is hard dance. As for punk they themselves called one of their releases "electronic punk" and they have several tracks which are clearly punk, such as Serial Thrilla and Fuel My Fire, the latter being a cover of another punk band's tune.

I`m surprised not to hear anything about jungle drum and bass. I mean, to me many tracks sound jungle like. Listen to the beats! They even have a song who mentions their genre, "Ruff In The Jungle Bizness". Maybe I`m wrong... but "electronica, big beat, alternative" makes me think about something like Chemical Brothers, not Prodigy. Think about some of their works: Everybody in the Place, Your Love, Ruff in the Jungle Bizbess, Rhythm of Life, Charly (drum and bass mix), Jericho, Music Reach (1-2-3-4), Hyperspeed.

See my comment at the bottom of the page, they were Rave. They played Raves up and down the country. At that point Rave had yet to really split down into Breakbeat/Hardcore, Piano, 4/4 Happy Hardcore, Ragga Rave/Jungle --> DNB etc etc. So no, they weren't drum and bass... Orbtastic 14:21, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

^^ Dude..the Prodigy are not drum and bass or jungle. None of their tracks contain an amen or anything similar to it, none of their tracks are close to 170 BPM (except for Fuel my Fire which is definitely not drum and bass)

I've just repaired the article from this. The Prodigy are notable for two things, Big Beat and Breakbeat Hardcore.

Though, it is disputed that their Big Beat sounds nothing like 'Big Beat', despite being actual pioneers of the genre (Big Beat, that is).

Of course the Prodigy are 'techno'... why do people have to nit pick all the time? 'Electronica' is a totally vague, useless term. The whole of their debut album is hardcore techno/rave music (rave itself isn't really a style of music, more an 'event'). The second album features a string of techno tracks, anyone who doesn't regard this style of music as techno, I'd like them to describe to me what they think techno actually is. Later albums could be classed as 'alternative' I guess, as the band began to move towards rockier sounds. User:DShamen 9:45, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Big Beat and Breakbeat Hardcore derives from Techno, but Techno does not feature breakbeat patterns (to start with), only does breakbeat hardcore. However, the track structure is that of techno and a lot of the synthesiser use is the same style as Techno. Big Beat also has emphasis on Electro and Hip Hop, and the use of those breakbeat and synthesised drum styles.

The Prodigy have got that old retro sci-fi horror theme from the 50s, their style has emphasis on cyberpunk and futurism, catchy music phrases, etc. It even says so on their YouTube channel http://www.youtube.com/user/prodigychannel

Electronica is the stupidest name for any kind of music, there is not a single band or artist that would deliberately describe themselves as such.

Electronica is not a genre, it is a collection of genres the suffix '-ica' resembles a collection in the English language. Electronica is a contemporary music genre collection said to be the music played in modern nightclubs internationally.

discography

The discography section doesn't match with the template. Which one is wrong?--Narayan (talk) 18:53, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Critical Acclaim

Surely the article should say how terrible the prodigy are? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.10.204.148 (talk) 16:18, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

That is a matter of opinion. J.M.Hunt (talk) 07:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia is a place for facts not personal opinions Mr Deathbat (talk) 07:59, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

More Music For The Jilted Generation/Experience Expanded

No mention is given to 'More Music For The Jilted Generation' and 'Experience : Expanded'. Shouldn't they be included in the discography? VenomousConcept (talk) 11:48, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I can see that they're covered on the pages of 'Experience' and 'Music For The Jilted Generation'. Maybe that's enough. VenomousConcept (talk) 12:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Why no picture of Liam?

? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.29.106.46 (talk) 15:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

16 million albums, unequaled in electronic music history ?????

Have you guys ever listened to a band called Depeche Mode? Yes, that big band that created a worldwide electronic movement in the 80's, well they have sold to date more than 75 million albums, which is by far more than the amount of records The Prodigy has sold. It is true that after their album Violator they explored different genres, such as rock and industrial, but even at that point of their career they had sold around 40 million albums, so the information related to The Prodigy's amount of sold albums is surpassed by far. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.216.128.197 (talk) 06:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC) What about scooter too, they are dance music and according to wikipedia have sold 25 million??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.172.14.38 (talk) 15:55, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Smokin' Aces

Should we add something in here about how their song "First Warning" was used in the film Smokin' Aces? 71.164.135.64 09:17, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

No. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.85.58 (talk) 05:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Music genres?

For months, I have saw the "genres" part of the infobox for this article getting too many changes from several users. They can add bullshitty nonsense like "Alternative dance punk", "Oldskool Rave", and some others (check all of its revisions for more details). I wish the genres be changed to "Big beat, alternative dance, dance punk, electronica, rave, alternative hip hop, hardcore techno", and be kept the same. Every single user must NOT edit the "genres" part of that template at all times. 'I () () `'/ I><pron0un¢ed "On£-ThouSand-$e7enT¥"> 04:17, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

gimme the old article back

YOu motherfuckers always discuss about some small shit.the old article was good and complete and you suckerchildren changed it because of your own stupidity.Fuckin nerds.

It has nothing to do with nerds. It’s the Wikinazis. Admins that try to force the world into their views. People that think being able to lurk here all day by sitting in the basement in their underpants qualifies them as “experts”. It’s the cancer that’s killing Wikipedia. Just look at how they forced the whole site to be based on the appeal to authority fallacy with that “reliable sources” concept, where “reliable” just happens to be what they define as “authorities”. They basically force you to guarantee whatever you read here is based on logical fallacies. EPIC FAIL! To me, Wikipedia is already dead because of it. And around here, Wikipedia already has become more of something you use in a joke. — 88.77.132.150 (talk) 12:15, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

File:FlintyMaxim.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:FlintyMaxim.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:26, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposal to change music genres

The current genres are unsourced and POV-based. I propose removing unreferenced genres and adding references to one which are, such as from the Allmusic page. Lachlanusername (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Someone please change the infobox picture to something like this

I don't yet have the ability to upload files nor do I know if this image is public domain. Can someone at least figure out if it can be used and if so then add it to the page. The stage showcases uniqueness and every band member is in the picture.

http://www.goodseedpr.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Prodigy-Warriors-Dance-Festival-2010-Photos-by-Ollie-Martin-Underground-Music.co-14.jpg

--Moonstrider101 (talk) 09:03, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Electronic rock?

Some of their really sound like electronic rock, shall we add it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DiendJap (talk • contribs) 05:14, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Industrial?

Could this band possibly be considered a form of industrial music? I see many similarities to NIN and they seem to fit the definition of the genre IMO... K0R0M0 (talk) 18:14, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

What to do when artists fail (relatively speaking) in the genre they evolved into

The Prodigy was at the beginning clearly a hardcore breakbeat/EDM/techno... etc, outfit that also incorporated bits and elements from all kind of classic instrumental music genres including even reggae (as in Out of Space). Disputing this or even minimizing it is utterly ridiculous. Then eventually they "evolved" (others might say "sold out") when they changed their tune in an apparent attempt to expand and conquer the American market by becoming an alternativey punky outfit. But clearly they didn't make the kind of impact in this new scene as they did in their old genre (for example on youtube their best viewed videos are their old school hardcore electro stuff, not their newer alternativey punky stuff). So I'd they the fact that they "evolved" into alternativey/punky outfit should of course be mentioned but so should the success or lack thereof in that endavour (in comparison to their success and impact of their old stuff). Loginnigol (talk) 10:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

NEW ALBUM: Maxim stated in a recent interview (09/2014) that the new album will be released in the first quarter of 2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.61.193.49 (talk) 15:11, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, if I do something wrong in writing this here. But maybe somebody could add informations about live album Music For The Voodoo Crew, which actually exists?

Alternative rock and industrial rock needed in genre infobox?

The Prodigy features loud and heavy guitar sounds more and more in their material at the time. They even have Jim Davies on guitar in some of their songs too.

P.S What happened to "Synthpunk". Someone might have removed it from the genre infobox.

Malmsimp (talk) 16:31, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Big Beat!!!

The prodigy have not done Big Beat! Examples of Big Beat artists are as follows:

Fatboy Slim

Midfield General

Jungle Brothers (some)

Daniel San

Freestylers (some earlier material) Cut La Roc

Monkey Mafia

Hotbox

Listen to any of the above before branding The Prodigy Big Beat. The Prodigy are a great band, but they did not really contribute to the Big Beat movement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackmileshunt (talk • contribs) 12:15, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

I agree, you can't really class The Prodigy as big beat due to the fact that are a different sound, making it hard to classify them. Mr Deathbat (talk) 12:20, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Thirded. Whoever thinks The Prodigy would be Big Beat, should seriously lay off the crack pipe. The Prodigy is what you get when you mix electronic music styles with punk rock styles. Which is kinda their whole appeal. The only thing you can play that the fans of both can appreciate. Big Beat sounds like what you hear on Big Beat radio. — 88.77.132.150 (talk) 12:08, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Right.

1. We already have big beat in the genre box (the group has a mixture of alternative rock and industrial combined together), and 2. They ARE part of the BIG BEAT movement, the genre with heavy "bang bang bang" style drums, distorted guitars and such.

Thanks

JG

Malmsimp (talk) 16:43, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

New album info?

We should add info about a new album. Liam already in February 2010 in an email interview for Stuff.co.nz website stated that they want to record a new album in late 2010 and release it in 2011. It should feature Keith and Maxim on vocals again and according to their August interview for Polish fansite, it should be slightly darker record.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamicz (talk • contribs) 21:44, September 2, 2010

Per WP:CRYSTAL, we shouldn't be adding this until it's official that the album is being released. Right now, we just have a statement that he wants to put out such an album. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 23:06, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

An ALL NEW album from the band called The Day Is My Enemy will be available to own from 30th March. You can pre-order it though before March. Thanks!! JG Malmsimp (talk) 17:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Music genres need changing at once!

It's really annoying when everybody keeps changing genres without discussion or sources!! I wish the genres be changed to "Big beat, electronica, synthpunk, alternative rock, electronic rock, alternative dance, dance punk, industrial rock, hardcore techno", breakbeat hardcore, and rave, and be kept the same.

Thanks!

Malmsimp (talk) 08:55, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

The guideline does not agree with your wish. It says to "aim for generality" and to limit the list to four entries. Your list must be pared down, with the entries made more general.

For starters, you might want to figure out how often each genre is used in a description of the band. Or you might want to concentrate on high quality sources which actually discuss how the band's styles have developed. In any case, the list needs to be shortened. Binksternet (talk) 07:53, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

I think I should stick to the supported 4. They are: Big beat, breakbeat hardcore, electronica and rave, and be kept the same.

THANKS IF I DIDN'T CATCH YOU BACK.

JG

Malmsimp (talk) 11:14, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on The Prodigy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081027125828/http://theprodigy.com:80/index.php/component/option,com_joomphpbb/Itemid,213/ to http://theprodigy.com/index.php/component/option,com_joomphpbb/Itemid,213/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081109203538/http://theprodigy.com:80/index.php/liam-h-blog to http://theprodigy.com/index.php/liam-h-blog

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Band members info box

If this is the end of the Prodigy should Flint be left in members or past members in the info box? Should we follow the format we have on The Beatles? Govvy (talk) 12:14, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

T404

I removed the factoid that Liam's first 10 demo tracks were produced on the "legendary T404". When I search Google for this, only Wikipedia mirrors return the name of this "legendary synthesizer". I suspect W30 would be the correct form, but could someone corrobate this? JFW | T@lk 16:55, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)

---

Hi JFW. You are of course right, there is no T404 Roland. I meant the Roland TB-303, which this page describes as 'defining the acid sound for rave music':

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Roland%20corporation

For further confirmation, try googling for: roland TB-303 prodigy

My confusion came about because there is a software synthesizer called T404, in homage to the contributions of the TB-303...

Thanks for pointing it out. I'll make the change.

Ire and curses 20:41, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

does anyone know what song of their's is in that new car commercial? it is the one where there are a bunch of cars zooming around each other, nearly hitting one another. Thanks

"You'll Be Under My Wheels" I think. --Sp82 14:48, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Main four genres

The infobox should not list more than four genres. The instructions at Template:Infobox_musical_artist#genre say "Aim for generality... and preferably use two to four."

What are the four main genres of the group? Binksternet (talk) 05:26, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Hackers

Interestingly enough, it was failed to be mentioned that some of the music from "Music For The Jilted Generation" appeared on the 1995 cult classic "Hackers". Just thought that might be something to add because that was how I got introduced to The Prodigy. 73.164.23.171 (talk) 03:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)