Talk:The Nightmare Fair

Doctor Who Low‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels: Sci-fi Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force.

Cancelled? Since when?

I've added a "citation needed" tag to the statement that Doctor Who was cancelled in 1985. I remember when the hiatus was announced and it was never indicated as anything but an 18-month "resting" of the program. If no one can provide a source that the show was actually physically cancelled, I recommend the statement be reworded. I've never come across a reference to this. 23skidoo 17:14, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The situation is muddled somewhat, IIRC, because the news of cancellation was published in the tabloids (notably the Sun) before any official BBC announcement, so the outrage the Sun stirred up led to the BBC saying it was only a hiatus. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 22:41, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The BBC seems to change its tone a lot. I seem to recall it backpedalling regarding Eccleston's departure, too. 23skidoo 22:47, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as a network beholden to the actual public rather than advertisers, it's definitely more conscious of its public image. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 23:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's true, although advertisers at least have the option of opting out. My understanding is if you want to have a legal TV in Britain you have to pay for BBC. Or at least that was the case back when Nightmare Fair was to have been produced, anyway. 23skidoo 00:58, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most of what I've read over the years implies that the very first announcements were of postponement not cancellation. This is supported by John Nathan-Turner who always claimed he was told throughout it was a deferral by one financial year, not a cancellation, and backed this up with the fact that both Eric Saward and himself were kept working in the production office on plans for the next series rather than being reassigned to other shows or given "garden leave".

Also it's strange to state the decision was Grade and Grade alone. The BBC structure is convoluted and the suggestion that top TV executives take decisions on cancellation on a personal whim seems bizarre. I forget if it was Nathan-Turner or Saward but at least one has recalled that Jonathan Powell seemed to express rather more hostility than Grade. Timrollpickering 20:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict with the Target novelisations

Should we note that the novelisations of Attack of the Cybermen and Mindwarp are published before and after this one (in lieu with every other article)?--DrWho42 (talk) 19:12, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fan adaptation

Is this section needed, as the second paragraph of the introduction is almost identical? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.134.253 (talk) 12:49, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Nightmare Fair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060504091247/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/thebatgranny/bak2.htm to http://homepage.ntlworld.com/thebatgranny/bak2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]