Talk:The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (video game)

Middle-earth Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

view
watch
edit
history
shell
vg talk
alerts
purge

AfDs

Jackpot World (0 participants)
Bejeweled Stars (3 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (2 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (3 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (8 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Fair use rationale for Image:Lotrfotrbox.jpg

Image:Lotrfotrbox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's box art provided by the publisher to illustrate the game. SetItAndForgetIt (talk) 02:39, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Troll Shores, what's in which version?

That whole section is unclear as to what is in which version. Bizzybody (talk) 06:27, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Update to 1.1

Google for fellowship_patch_us_1_1.exe for the US version. It's on many game sites. The URL on the game packaging was taken over by a UK stage production which has ended its run. Bizzybody (talk) 07:25, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'Thank' You Very Much

To the self-important t*** who deleted all the additions I carefully and lovingly made to improve this page and relate its amazing user-experience having played it entirely through: Thanks a lot you D***. If you wish to challenge the input, do so in 'discussion', don't just wade in with your bloody scythe and destroy others' well-intentioned work. Just because YOU don't think it's a valid or worthy addition does not mean that others might not find it so, and to summarily delete valid and germaine additions without discussion is reckless, childish, irresponsible and not worthy of a welcome custodian of a Wikipedia page. Only the 'civility' clause in ToU prevents me from telling you what I really think of you. You need to go away and re-read the Talk Page Guidelines about how to deal with contributions (esp. from new contributors) which you (in your singular opinion) do not think are worthy. 92.22.204.42 (talk) 13:42, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]