The Indian Princess (play) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article was the subject of an educational assignment. Further details were available on the "Education Program:CUNY, Brooklyn College/Theater History from 1642 (Spring 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
A fact from The Indian Princess (play) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 April 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article is clearly written and organized very well. It is broken up into clear sections and leads you in with an appropriate summary. The subject matter is presented with a neutral point of view and provides enough information without being overly specific. The wiki links are used in the correct way and are informative, as well as the sources that prove to be reliable. No copyright violations are evident and the image applied is interesting. I did notice a couple of spelling errors, but overall this is a very well written article! It should be passed as a Good Article.
EmilyBlume (talk) 17:05, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
MOS compliant. Lead summarises principle aspects of topic, structure meets the layout guidelines, wording has been corrected to avoid imprecise or vague terminology, plot section trimmed to appropriate length (in-universe style is adequately balanced by rest of article).
Reference list provided in accordance with footnote guidelines (Harvard formatting).
B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
Sources cited are largely inaccessible to me, so I can't vouch that they verify the information. However, all of them certainly exist, and appear to be reliable secondary or tertiary sources (largely academic publications). Assuming good faith, pass on this criterion.