Talk:The Dualers

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recent edits

Dear friends, it seems clear that one editor with an acknowledged connection with the band seems intent on making this page into a gushy fan site with superfluous detail and lots of puffery and unreferenced POV. Wikipedia requires citations to reliable, authoritative, and neutral third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE and HERE. Regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 02:50, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic promotional prattle / edit warring

Seems @Tazsummers: is hell-bent on deleting existing reliable sources and introducing promotionally-toned content, given repeated unjustified reverts by @GorgeCustersSabre: and a revert of WP:DUCK IP by @Ponyo: back in June ([1], compare [2]). Before escalating this to WP:AN3 or similar board, could there be any content concerns in these reverts? Dl2000 (talk) 23:45, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked Tazsummers for continued promotional editing despite multiple requests to abide by our conflict of interest requirements and guidelines.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:53, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Before closing off, a typo/wording error on my initial post should be rectified - the phrase should read more like "unjustified reverts by of @GorgeCustersSabre" Dl2000 (talk) 00:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]