Jump to content

Talk:The Boat Race 1927/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 97198 (talk · contribs) 06:24, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good – will do a thorough review later this evening. 97198 (talk) 06:24, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Very well written, concise and easy to understand.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    All claims are referenced, and all references appear to be reliable sources.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    All main aspects of the race are covered in good detail. The background section is especially useful for non-fans.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    No neutrality problems.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Good use of images, both of which are appropriately licensed.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Great work as usual. I made a few minor changes (feel free to revert any you disagree with) and I'm otherwise unable to fault anything in the article. GA it is! 97198 (talk) 10:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nah, looks great. Thanks for the review, the tweaks and picking up on the error too! The Rambling Man (talk) 10:35, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]