Talk:Strongyloides stercoralis
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Testing
[edit]Question......Can someone test positive for Strongyloides Stercoralis and actually have a different parasitic infection and NOT Strongyloides afterall?
- It is perfectly possible for someone to have strongyloides as well as another parasitic disease. Is it possible for someone to not have strongloides and yet have a positive test? It depends on the test: if the test in question was examination of a stool or sputum specimen, then I would say no. If the test was serology (a blood test) then the answer is yes: you could have had strongyloides and then been treated for it: the blood test would remain positive for months if not years afterwards--Gak 10:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Strongyloidiasis
[edit]This article should be merged with strongyloidiasis--Gak 10:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Detection of parasite
[edit]Question: Can this parasite be detected thru a blood work up, such a special stain, as opposed to a work up on a stool, i.e. wet mount? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.226.72.28 (talk) 16:22, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, the ELISA worm antibody test. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.106.9.113 (talk) 14:27, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
NHS Article
[edit]Out of interest, the NHS reference NHS Direct Health encyclopaedia - Threadworms does not discuss a Strongyloides. It does however discuss Enterobius vermicularis, which is quite different (and more widespread) than Strongyloides. As such, the redirect "Threadworm" should probably not come here. Shot info (talk) 01:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Threadworm now redirects to Pinworm, which is the worm in the NHS Direct article. --Maltelauridsbrigge (talk) 11:51, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- To clarify some of this confusion, there is a difference in US vs. UK usage (this is according to Village Medical Manual by Mary Vanderkooi, 5th ed., 2000).
- pinworm in the US is enterobius
- pinworm in the UK is strongyloides
- threadworm in the US is strongyloides
- threadworm in the UK, I have not heard of aside from the above-cited article, which evidently equates it with enterobius
- In other words, pinworm and threadworm have swapped meanings across the pond. :)
- 02:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by SlothMcCarty (talk • contribs)
Video of Strongyloides stercoralis in microscope
[edit]This is a shor video from a sample of an infected patient May of 2008.You can se the movements of the parasite and incredible cuantity very clear. [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Melvincp (talk • contribs) 18:18, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Missing description of the worm
[edit]This article lacks a description of the worm. One might expect, at the very least, to learn from an encyclopaedia how long an adult worm might be. 82.71.24.65 (talk) 10:00, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- There's a brief description (including its length) in the "Morphology" section. Graham87 15:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Histology
[edit]Could Strongyloides fuelleborni cause a near-positive strongyloides serology? Is there any way to know which one it is? 93.106.9.113 (talk) 14:27, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Content to be moved to the article on the disease
[edit]Graham87 has deleted the following content from this page, see below - but it should not be deleted but moved to the page on the disease: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strongyloidiasis
Also, there is still a lot more that should be moved, i.e. the parts on diagnosis and treatment?
Complete eradication must be attained to prevent dangerous illness. This requires daily ivermectin 200-400 micrograms / kg, combined with Albendazol, for 14 days<ref>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15689061</ref>. With short treatments such as currently recommended, infections are not likely to be fully cured. ==Serology follow-up is necessary== − Regular serology monitoring must be provided. Stool samples are not reliable for follow-up<ref>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25668740</ref>. Of the available serology tests, IVD-ELISA and IFAT had the best performance according to study<ref>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25668740</ref>. − − ==National treatment strategies are needed== − It is a public safety concern that such follow-up be made available to the public without cost. A concerted national and international effort is needed. This need is recognized by the WHO<ref>http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/diseases/strongyloidiasis/en/</ref>. − − ==Transmission== − − Transmission has been documented through contact with saliva such as kissing <ref>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2310/7060.2000.00063/pdf</ref>. − − Transmission through breast milk has been documented in animals and is probable in humans <ref>http://www.ndhealth.gov/disease/Documents/Presentation/Dwelle/Helminthology%20%96%20Nematodes%20Strongyloides.pdf</ref> − − More information is needed about transmission through skin contact, clothes and home surfaces. Information is also needed concerning effective disinfectants. − − Family members should be routinely treated, if one family member is or is thought to be infected. Proof is difficult to obtain as in 70 percent of cases, a single stool sample is falsely negative<ref>http://www.aafp.org/afp/2002/0315/p1208a.html</ref>. It is important to treat family members empirically<ref>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2310/7060.2000.00063/pdf</ref> even without proof of infection. They may not have the same symptoms. In the case study, an infected spouse suffered from symptoms such as insomnia, tinnitus and depression.
EvM-Susana (talk) 12:38, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Strongoloides are not threadworms. Strongoloidez are much more hazardous threadworms aren’t even close please edit 2601:182:A80:AB20:716D:C5DA:FD07:E644 (talk) 23:34, 29 October 2023 (UTC)