Talk:Strong authentication

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Expansion

This article needs considerable expansion. Could someone with expertise have a go at it? Dbfirs 14:24, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merged already into Authentication

Without third-party sources, unlike the ones in there now, to say nothing of a clear definition, this really doesn't merit an article. I think the concept is already covered quickly and cleanly in Authentication. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 04:15, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion and Relevance

Issues

This article has several issues:

it is focused on the European Union and all sources are centered around ECB-regulations
it misses a global view
it still misses a clear description of the alternatives for strong authentication (e.g., dual channel authentication via mobile phone and computer,,,,)

Relevance

The subject is relevant as increasing Internet fraud makes this stronger approach of authentication more relevant. The main article about authentication is not really able to answer this and really responds in a summary approach (which is good enough in the overall context of authentication).

Next Steps

I am currently selecting notable sources to improve this article. If anybody wants to join in, pls simply comment in this talk page. Also you might want to provide links to sources here. Any support or suggestions are deeply appreciated.

ScienceGuard (talk) 08:41, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mention Everest.org and others leading these efforts

Everest.org is building and deploying a strong encryption solution. It is promising because it is based on facial recognition, something you have, and will therefore exclude bots and imposters. It will be helpful to mention this and other similar efforts underway. thanks! Lbeaumont (talk) 13:28, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uptake

It is disappointing that social media sites are slow to integrate strong authentication into their platforms. Being able to identify the (human) author of each social media post is an important step toward improving the intellectual honesty of each post. Perhaps some discussion of the current state of strong authentication on social media sites, along with a discussion of forces advancing and delaying the uptake will be helpful. Thanks! Lbeaumont (talk) 13:32, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]