Talk:Stanley Krippner

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 October 2009. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Archives

/Archive 1

Awards and honors

The standard for awards and honors in biographies of living persons is to list them as a section at the end of the article. See featured articles for numerous examples. Also only notable awards should be listed. If the awards are notable there will be some discussion of them in third party sources beyond the primary sources announcing the award. Most of the awards currently listed don't seem particularly notable and the sourcing is completely inadequate. - - MrBill3 (talk) 05:53, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated removal of well sourced content in short time

The repeated removal of sourced content and section blanking is not appropriate. I have restored the content. Disruptive editing and edit warring are against policy. - - MrBill3 (talk) 03:07, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adding in fringe material

These IPs and user (possibly all the same person) keep adding in fringe psychic sources and/or deliberately deleting reliable sources from the article.

I ask this person/s to please discuss this on the talk-page first. If this is continued then it is nothing more than disruptive vandalism and the article may have to be locked. If you have an issue please discuss it here so we can sort it. Thanks. Goblin Face (talk) 15:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removal restored, content based only on primary sources removed

Substantial sourced content was removed with a misleading edit summary. I have restored. There was a substantial chunk of puffery based only on the primary sources for the content. If this information is notable it will have been covered by reliable secondary sources. If secondary sources report this content it can be restored when secondary sources are provided. - - MrBill3 (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

COI Censorship

There is clearly a campaign by one or more COI editors to censor this article. That campaign has reached the point where the editing is becoming disruptive. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abusive language

The text quotes Gardner's "a pretty, plump, dark-eyed little charlatan". It is not clear to me in what way the adjectives add anything of value, so would it not be better were those frankly offensive words removed, so the article simply made reference to "a charlatan"? --Brian Josephson (talk) 18:52, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Colaboración libro

"El Retorno de los sabios" Coautor José Ignacio Carmona(2013)ISBN 9788494113314 83.56.51.142 (talk) 00:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]