Talk:Spike Lester

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 October 2016. The result of the discussion was redirect to Bennett and Standish families.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

can't tell your Spikes without a scorecard

Amusing that Passions introduced a character named Spike after the second or third death of Spike (vampire), who was a fan of Passions. —Tamfang 21:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Bennett and Standish families

I personally am completely against this, Spike is certainly a notable enough character for his own page.. Remember we're not trying to save hard disk space here! -- Dougie WII (talk) 23:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spike is definitely an noteworthy character, but I personally don't think that there's enough information for him to warrant a separate article. There's little here, and, aside from re-working the grammar and organization of the article, there's not really much that can be added. — Spanish lullaby (talk) 04:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]