Talk:Sierra Leone at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- From nominator: While the article might be shorter than average in length, it meets the GA criteria and follows the convention on Games summary – Nations MOS. Similar GA articles include Palau at the 2008 Summer Olympics, Great Britain at the 2002 Winter Paralympics and Great Britain at the 2010 Winter Paralympics. If this GAN passes, I will consider working to elevate all other nation at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics articles to GA status. ANGCHENRUI Talk♨ 04:03, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
This looks fine except for one issue, the shortness of the article—or, as far as GAs go, the extreme shortness.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Compared to, say, Palau at the 2008 Summer Olympics, this (a) has no image (b) describes the events in very little detail, giving an end result only (c) says little outside the very events. How was the athletes chosen? How did the athletes react on the performances, how did others react? I realize that the media coverage of Sierra Leone probably is scarce, but to have nothing is not appropriate either, for the GA level.
Re: point b, "without going into unnecessary detail", this should go into more detail..
- Compared to, say, Palau at the 2008 Summer Olympics, this (a) has no image (b) describes the events in very little detail, giving an end result only (c) says little outside the very events. How was the athletes chosen? How did the athletes react on the performances, how did others react? I realize that the media coverage of Sierra Leone probably is scarce, but to have nothing is not appropriate either, for the GA level.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Is this impossible to illustrate?
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- for now. Geschichte (talk) 20:06, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing has happened, so this fails. Feel free to try again with a reassessment, but the above points should be seen to first. Geschichte (talk) 22:28, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: