This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
The time of 9.90s would be a national record, according to National records in the 100 metres. The old record (9.98s) stood since 1977, so this would be quite remarkable. Not less remarkable would be that Reynaldo Espinosa appears to have run 9.96s in the very same race, also breaking the old record. The source used at his article, [1] does not include information whether the wind was below the allowable limit, which would be interesting to know. Renerpho (talk) 01:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hildreth gazzard: since you edited both articles, I wonder if you have a source that talks about the wind, or the legality of the result in general? Thanks! Renerpho (talk) 01:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes huge leaps in progress for both of them. This article states the wind was 0.0 p/s
[1] and the Track & Field Gazette tweeted a video of the race which stated the wind was the same 0.0 [2]Hildreth gazzard (talk) 02:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The times are appearing in quite a few sources now. Obviously I will remove if turns out to be a mistake Hildreth gazzard (talk) 02:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
