Talk:Sea Dragon

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Fishes

This disambiguation page is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles

On 20 June 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Seadragon. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Requested move 20 June 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:53, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sea Dragon → Seadragon – WP:DABNAME Schierbecker (talk) 03:18, 18 June 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:41, 25 June 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ~Styyx^Talk? 18:49, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Schierbecker Why is an admin needed for this and not just a pagemover? Am I missing something? -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed, an admin is not needed because the page is not move-protected. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 13:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Schierbecker, can you explain further why DABNAME would favor this form over the other? I don’t oppose, I just don’t fully understand. The last bullet of DABNAME at least favors the form most frequently used in its pages. I think I counted 5 single-word entries and 8 two-word entries (though a lot of those aren’t directly linked entries). As I said, not contesting, just seeking clarification. -2pou (talk) 15:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also not objecting, but with no response and an element of doubt I suspect a full RM might be the best option. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:36, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per User:2pou. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.