Talk:Scrambler (ride)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scrambler (ride) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Amusement Parks Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Terminology

Is there a more neutral way to refer to this ride universally? In the U.S., I've never heard it referred to as "Twist"---- Indeed, I don't think anyone would know what you were talking about if you did. It's pretty much always called "Scrambler" here regardless of the actual brand... --Rehcsif 20:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to this link, Eli Bridge invented the ride concept, and that would show some preference for the Scrambler terminology IMHO. --Rehcsif 20:37, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I've never heard the term Twist in the U.S., and seeing as it was initially (and is still) manufactured as the Scrambler, I would think that's the most accurate name for topic. Michaelmaltese47 (talk) 00:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from this URL: http://www.nfa.dept.shef.ac.uk/history/rides/twist.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is variants information legitimate?

The categorization under Variants (Grasscutters, Sizzlers, and the Gee Whizzer) seems arbitrary and lacks sources. If you Google for Scramblers, Sizzlers, Grasscutters, Twists, and Gee Whizzers, you can see that many of them look practically identical: I can't see any large pattern of differences other than of that between individual carnival rides. It's especially confusing that Wisdom's basic Sizzler model is not listed under the Sizzler variant.

Is the difference that some have platforms underneath them, and some don't? That doesn't seem enough to deserve an entire section.

There some information that could be moved to the history section (when manufacturers starting concentrating on ride aesthetics), some could be moved to history or general information or a safety section (the news article about fatalities), and the rest could be in a "Current models" section, if notable enough. Michaelmaltese47 (talk) 01:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think we need some expert input from rollercoaster historians if possible Atlantic306 (talk) 01:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]