This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptozoology, an attempt to improve coverage of the pseudoscience and subculture of cryptozoology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CryptozoologyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptozoologyTemplate:WikiProject CryptozoologyCryptids articles
Salinella is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles
This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Blackwelder, R.E. (1963). Classification of the Animal Kingdom. Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press. [original source for "Monoblastozoa"]
Furuya, Hidetaka (2004). 中生動物研究の現状 [Current Situation of Systematic Study on the Mesozoa]. Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology (in Japanese). 16: 1–8. doi:10.19004/taxa.16.0_1. ISSN1342-2367. [discusses Mesozoa, mentions Salinella]
Dunning, Hayley (1 October 2012). "Gone Missing, circa 1892". The Scientist Magazine. Retrieved 2024-05-21.
This is neither obsolete nor dubious, rather it's uncertain (whether it ever existed or still exists). I'll consider removing those categories. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.169.98.40 (talk) 14:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In the taxonomy box the term "Acrolophocyta" is used. This name has no Google hits expect this page itself and a few mirror sites. Is it a misspelling of an actual taxonomic term? I've gone ahead and removed it, but I'm making a note here in case anyone knows more. 2602:306:CCF2:EB39:E1B4:33D6:B1E2:72A2 (talk) 00:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This article needs to be revised by an experienced writer. It seems to have been written by someone with poor skills in writing. EGetzler (talk) 14:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
