Talk:Retreat of glaciers since 1850
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Retreat of glaciers since 1850 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
Retreat of glaciers since 1850 is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 18, 2006. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to climate change, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
|
||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 8 sections are present. |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Some suggestions about restructuring (revisited)
[edit]I am repeating some suggestions which I had made a year ago but which were mostly dismissed as it was in the middle of the featured article review. Now that the article has been reviewed and demoted, I'd like to raise my points again. This is what I had written earlier: "I see that was I had suggested as "fundamentals" has now been added before the regional information, and I have just reworked it a bit now. My original suggestion was: "I think we are missing some more information about "fundamentals" at the start of the article, before it dives into all the different regions. I.e. things that are common throughout the world. I am missing a section on "causes" (Ok, might just be one sentence: it's getting warmer), but also one on "measurement techniques" perhaps? I have moved the section on "effects" up towards the start for that reason, too. Also the third paragraph in the lead contains information that is not really well covered in the main body; that's not ideal as the lead is meant to be a summary of the article. So I think we should have a section about the broad historical outline (after 1850), and then summarise that briefly in the lead. The lead should be made into a better summary, although it won't be easy to summarise all that content from the different regions. Note the article is also very long (60 kB of prose). Is it going into too much details in some areas where sub-articles exist?" - The current structure is now like this which is better (i.e. we no longer need a section called "fundamentals" now):
1 Causes 2 Measurements 2.1 Estimated glacial losses ---> does this fit under "measurements" or should it be elsewhere? 3 Effects 3.1 Water supply 3.2 Ecosystems 3.3 Floods 3.4 Sea level rise 3.5 Management approaches --> does this fit here? It's very short which is why I didn't think that it should be a Level-1 heading.
EMsmile (talk) 11:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- I've made some changes to the structure now in order to address the concerns I had raised here a year ago. I think it's better now. EMsmile (talk) 07:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- The new structure is now like this:
Scale at the global level Causes Impacts Middle latitude Polar regions Tropics Management approaches
EMsmile (talk) 07:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Is the statement in the lead about the 5500 gigatons correct?
[edit]I came back to this article while working on water cycle which I am currently updating for climate change effects. I wanted to include something about glaciers and saw the sentence in the lead Excluding peripheral glaciers of ice sheets, total global glacial losses were likely 5500 gigatons over 1993–2018.
However, I can't find this figure in the source provided (AR 6). Is it wrong? I found this statement in chapter 9 of the WG I report: Excluding peripheral glaciers of ice sheets (RGI regions 5 and 19), glacier mass loss rate was very likely 170 ± 80 Gt yr –1 for the period 1971 to 2019 (8 [4 to 14] % of 1971 glacier mass), 210 ± 50 Gt yr –1 over the period 1993–2019 (6 [4 to 8] % of 1993 glacier mass) and 240 ± 40 Gt yr–1 over the period 2006–2019 (3 [2 to 4] % of 2006 glacier mass.
. Maybe it's anyway better for this statement in the lead to not provide actual numbers (nobody has a feel for Gt anyhow) but to just say this In summary, new evidence published since SROCC shows that, during the decade 2010–2019, glaciers lost more mass than in any other decade since the beginning of the observational record
(same report, 9. 1275) EMsmile (talk) 09:46, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, I got the answer now: I checked with Thian Y Gan (one of the IPCC authors) and he explained it to me: "I believe that is about right based on the estimate of 210 ± 50 Gt yr –1 over the period 1993–2019, 210 x 26 = 5460 Gt? That statement is found in page 65 of Chapter 9 of ARG-WGI- " So the 5500 gigaton figure is the accumulated amount over 26 years whereas the other figures are averages for a "per year" (hence it's called rate). I think I'll provide both figures here in the article for greater clarity. EMsmile (talk) 19:14, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Add more references to the lead?
[edit]My suggestion is that more refs should be added to the lead. This would be particularly useful if the lead is transcribed to another article with the excerpt too. Does anyone object? If not, which are the main refs we should use, I am assuming Chapter 9 of the AR 6 WG 2 report? EMsmile (talk) 09:20, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Some condensing needed
[edit]The article is a bit on the long side (60 kB (9918 words)). Looking at the section sizes (see top of the talk page), it seems that the sections about Europe, Himalayas and Antarctica are a bit too long. Probably some of that content could be moved to sub-articles (which perhaps didn't exist yet when this article was first created). Most of this article's content was added in 2006 and in 2015. So updating of figures and references is also needed. EMsmile (talk) 08:17, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging User:InformationToKnowledge as you would probably be in a good position to condense/update the section on Antarctica. For example I wonder if we still need that bullet point list on ice shelves or if this could be deleted or an excerpt used from ice shelf. I mean the section beginning with "Ice shelves are not stable when surface melting occurs. The situation with some notable ice shelves is explained below:". Pageviews for this article are in the range of 300 pageviews per day so "middle of the range" for a climate change article. EMsmile (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've made some changes to the ice shelf content now by removing that bullet point list (moving some of it to ice shelf). As this topic is fast moving (and fast melting...), I think it's better if it's located and updated in one article location (at ice shelf) not several articles. And then rather link to the other article from here. EMsmile (talk) 11:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Current Topics in Earth and Environmental Sciences
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2023 and 9 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dylan5723 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Dylan5723 (talk) 20:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia former featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class Environment articles
- Mid-importance Environment articles
- B-Class Climate change articles
- Top-importance Climate change articles
- WikiProject Climate change articles
- B-Class Geology articles
- Mid-importance Geology articles
- Mid-importance B-Class Geology articles
- WikiProject Geology articles
- B-Class Glacier articles
- Top-importance Glacier articles
- WikiProject Glacier articles
- Wikipedia articles that use American English