Talk:Ravenfield (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

view
watch
edit
history
shell
vg talk
alerts
purge

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

He should talk about the future conquest mode.

Who? You’re able to edit it. Also, next time, please click the new section button. SwaggerKing32 (talk) 23:20, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Should We Remove The 'Multiple Issues' Template?

I was saying, should we remove the 'Multiple Issues' template from the article? I mean, it says that the game may not be too "notable" for inclusion in Wikipedia and it "relies too much on primary sources". Well, it sold more than 5,00,000 copies and got reviewed by P.C. Gamer, Kotaku and I.G.R., three of the most notable reviewers on Earth! I think this message was put up because of the excess use of "official" sources-- those which are governed by the bodies connected to the subject of concern. True, but this is necessary, because in addition to proving the subject's notability (which the editors did and I just pointed out), we need some exact to-the-point info that can be, especially in cases of video games, only be provided by the developers.

So, I really think that we should remove that disturbing message.

By the way, I'm a fairly new Wikipedia editor. So, don't get all mad because of my suggestion and then go on without thinking deleting all my valuable contributions (believe me, I have some of 'em), my created articles or even my personal SANDBOX (that's happened to me...)!!! I respect the editors here, and in exchange, I demand for a new NATION! (kiddin'... now please don't get mad for kidding. I won't do it again)

Yours sincerely,
AnotherHomoSapein (talk) 15:24, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Add it to Xbox

Pls add it to Xbox so I I can play it it looks fun and cool please I am so sad I can’t play it. 2600:8800:5080:17D0:F45F:35CC:BB2E:9E33 (talk) 21:11, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page is for discussion of the article itself, not its subject. Discussion of the subject can take place on the Steam forum for the game or on its itch.io page.

P.S: Yes, I know that they commented without an account and thus probably will never see this, I'm just saying so that anyone who sees this will know about the talk page guidelines.

P.P.S:h 41

Dominic 41 (talk) 23:13, 29 December 2023 (UTC) signing off...[reply]

Let’s keep this updated with the current EA

Keep this Updated 168.100.171.2 (talk) 17:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]