Talk:Rainband/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The references should have publication dates when possible.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Great work overall. There's one fairly minor issue with the citations, so for now, I'll put this article on hold. Cheers, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 18:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

The ref issue has been dealt with. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:45, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Looks good. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 03:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)