Talk:Railway lines of Poland

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains Stub‑class

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Stub

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

One thousand red links ?

Just a friendly suggestion. If you don't intend to write most of them, don't red-link lines without proof of their notability. Besides, it looks bad, like the proverbial death by a thousand cuts. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 02:58, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. The quickest way to remove the one thousand red links is to open the editing window, copy the entire content and paste it into Microsoft Word. In Word, there's a function called "search and replace". You can type in "| [[" and click "replace all" without putting anything to replace it with. Then repeat the process for "_]]". Copy the revised document and paste it back into here. Poeticbent talk 04:27, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Side note. When a new article is written (or spotted) it can always be added here thus preventing the risk of being "Orphaned" tagged. The new article does not have to have the exact name "PKP rail line such and such"... It can be piped from commonly recognizable name per WP:TITLE policy/guideline which recommends "Recognizability" (either way). Poeticbent talk 21:51, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article should get a massive overhaul

A list of issues with the article:

1. The beginning of the article looks very unprofessional (the third paragraph features too much caps), leading to a website that doesn't even exist

2. Most of the stations are in red/point to the wrong places (for example the line 139 does not lead to the Katowice Ligota railway station, but it leads to the article about Ligota (the neighbourhood))

3. The article seems like it was copypasted from the Polish wiki, with many of the references still being in Polish Bootlegcirno (talk) 20:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]