Talk:Queen Margaret Union

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education: Student Affairs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
	This article is supported by Student Affairs task force.

External Links and Articles

I added a section for links to external news articles on the QMU and related material. Thought i'd post a discussion here on what should be included so as to avoid any conflict of interest.

--Jmchale 10:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Membership Figures

Note for whoever keeps on changing the membership figures:

This year the QMU's membership stands at over 7500, last year just a shade over 7000 and the year before 6700. Therefore, a reasonable approximation of the membership is 7000.

- The current membership figure is actually closer to 8000 this year (checked yesterday), only a hundred or so off. Jmchale 11:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC) -[reply]

BoM Photo

Regarding the photo of the outgoing Board of Management, would it be possible to get it fixed and have the copyright info sorted? SeumasS 21:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think it is that good an addition to the article. I'd rather see more of the building or a historical photo. --cloudo 08:27, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. A historical picture in particular would be interesting. --Stween 12:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DUCK

you know that banner with the duck on it that you always boost about with at freshers' address wtf is that about? --cloudo 10:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool as. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.216.112.22 (talk) 02:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The qmunicate homophobic & anti-semetic problem

I have reverted previous edits to personally attack Joe Evans with non cited information. I also reverted an edit by PresidentGary which had removed it completely. I think this is one of the few interesting things in that ridiculously large section has in it. There is cited info in there now. What are the grounds for removing it completley?

I don't think the comments are totally fair - The printing of the anti-semitic comment did happen, and was immediatly apologised for and action taken. The "homophobic comment" was actually a film quote taken out of context, and to call it a homophobic comment seems to miss this point, which was the basic explaination for why it appeared there. I think including this information without any surrounding explaination fails to do justice to the situation at the time - Jamie McHale 12/11

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queen Margaret Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090410063205/http://live.cgcu.net:80/news/1343 to http://live.cgcu.net/news/1343
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.theherald.co.uk/search/display.var.1941788.0.union_with_many_crowns_from_cobain_to_queen.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]