Talk:Project portfolio management/Archives/2016
Appearance
This is an archive of past discussions about Project portfolio management. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Written as an Advertisement?
In May of 2013 a notice was put up that this article appears to be written like an advertisement. I actually disagree with that. I read through a lot and gained some good insight for a project I'm working on. Should that notice be removed or do others disagree with me? Jasenlee (talk) 15:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'll agree and take it down. The notice was posted 20:13, 13 May 2013 by user 66.6.146.58
- There is no talk or detail to work with, the description at history only says "(holy crap)"
- No such concern apparent to Jasenlee and I and nobody else voiced one
- Significant time and deletions have occurred - e.g. sections The PPM market and Capability Definition, and references to PMI PMBOK and Gartner. (I think it was better before but ... point here is that eliminated area where such a concern might have been.)
- Deleting next Markbassett (talk) 15:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
It seems the wording was nicked verbatim from "The Wiley Guide to Project, Program, and Portfolio Management" (see here ). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.153.89.193 (talk) 13:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, the textbook is from 2016, the Wikipedia text is older. It seems it's the textbook that blatantly plagiarized Wikipedia. Wouldn't be the first time. No longer a penguin (talk) 13:20, 6 December 2016 (UTC)