Talk:Process Communication Model
 | Disambiguation | |||
| ||||
[Untitled][edit]
Process Communication Model may also refer to a theory about human personality and human interaction, developed by Dr *Taibi Kahler*. Link to the documentation his company provides: http://www.kahlercommunications.com/processcommunication.html.
--Bogdanbiv (talk) 15:51, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Likewise, I am unable to find reference to the programming Process Communication Model, but there are plenty of companies using Taibi Kahler's PCM. I will send the redirect to Taibi Kahler with a hatnote back to Concurrent computing for disambiguation. I can write a new article for Process Communication Model, but it will take a while.aeon-lakes 10:29, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect should not go to a specific person, even someone who has been extensively involved with the concept. Readers who are searching for Process Communication Model are looking for more information about that concept. They will find that if they end up at Concurrent computing, not the Kahler article. Kahler can be linked at Concurrent computing, and then the reader can find more information about that person. Sundayclose (talk) 17:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect was to a specific person in the absence of a specific page on the "Process Communication Model". Google searches for "Process Communication Model" do not produce links in the context of Concurrent computing, they link to organisations using the human psychology work of Taibi Kahler. Therefore the redirect within wikipedia should be to Taibi Kahler in the absence of a specific article as that page has more notability. Users seeking information on a human communication model will gain nothing from a computing page. aeon-lakes 22:30, 10 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aeon-lakes (talk • contribs)
- Your reasoning is wrong on this. If a reader of Wikipedia is interested in Process Communication Model and enters it into search, they are not looking for a specific person. They are looking for concepts related to PCM, not a person. The redirect should be to a concept, not a person. Google searches don't dictate how redirects should be made on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is written for readers not familiar with a topic. But just out of curiosity, I Googled PCM and and found links to some webpages that are not exclusively about Kahler. I just noticed that you edited the PCM page to a dab page. That is more appropriate than a link to Kahler's page. Sundayclose (talk) 00:05, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect was to a specific person in the absence of a specific page on the "Process Communication Model". Google searches for "Process Communication Model" do not produce links in the context of Concurrent computing, they link to organisations using the human psychology work of Taibi Kahler. Therefore the redirect within wikipedia should be to Taibi Kahler in the absence of a specific article as that page has more notability. Users seeking information on a human communication model will gain nothing from a computing page. aeon-lakes 22:30, 10 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aeon-lakes (talk • contribs)
I have now disambiguated Process Communication Model. The wikicomputing hatnote has been added to the Talk page for Process Communication Model (computing) which now automatically redirects to Concurrent computing while it awaits a primary article. I have yet to create a 'Process Communication Model (psychology)' page, as an article with that title was previously deleted and I have no content for it fit to publish as yet. aeon-lakes 09:08, 11 April 2015 (UTC)