Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Pork Chop Hill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Pork Chop Hill)

Untitled

[edit]

I am going to start annotating this article as soon as I finish expanding the article. The amount of material on the Chinese view appears limited but I will include what I have. For now it appears it can remain a single article covering both actions.--Buckboard 12:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

the casualty maybe wrong

[edit]

I think the casualties of both sides were wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.144.96.158 (talk) 04:40, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Casualties are wrong!

[edit]

"Company K (1st Lt. Joseph G. Clemons, Jr.) and Company L (1st Lt. Forrest J. Crittendon), 31st Infantry, in reserve behind the MLR, were ordered to counterattack and began their attack at 04:30 on April 17. By dawn they reached the main trenches on top of the hill but suffered almost 50% casualties" - this would mean that total casualties of UN were from these companies.... This has to be wrong —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.150.127.116 (talk) 17:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


What is wrong is equating the 50% casualties of King and Love companies to the total casualties (476) of that April battle. King had 135 men to start with. Love probably wasn't very different and I think Love's supporting attack (of King's attack) was 2 platoons amounting to 62 men. Don't forget that Easy of the 31st was originally there and overrun suffering heavily. Able, Easy, Fox, and George of the 17th also fought on Pork Chop and most of them had a pretty rough time as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.253.187.17 (talk) 09:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


COL. R.F. Arment,USA, (Ret) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.10.217.10 (talk) 04:39, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Pork Chop Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move discussion notification

[edit]

A requested move discussion is occurring at Talk:Pork Chop Hill#Requested move 3 October 2022 to consider moving Pork Chop Hill to Pork Chop Hill (film). Users interested in this page may want to participate in the discussion, which is related to this page. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:45, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battle_of_Pork_Chop_Hill&oldid=1214047507"