Talk:Pogali

The problems, and how to resolve them

1. iso639-3:hkh exists, and says "Khah, Poguli" as the language names;
2. Both Khah language and Khah dialect redirect here;
3. @Taskeenmak: always remove "iso3=hkh" parameter, without explaining why remove;
4. There's a draft Draft:Khah Language that is rejected for submitting because the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia.

--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Spelling of title

The article was just renamed from Poguli to Pogali, based on a claim that this is the common name. I don't know which of the two is more "correct", or if Pogali is more common in informal discourse. What I do know is that while this spelling has some uses in the literature [1], it's still less common there than Poguli [2], which is the spelling used in the virtually all the better quality linguistics literature. – Uanfala (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Uanfala Thanks for the message. First of all, let me be clear that I am working on Wikipedia: WikiProject Chenab Valley because I belong to this area. I most need to make improvements in the articles about the region. But this is not enough. I would suggest to read this and read this . There are many more citations which use the word "Pogali" as commonly as I firstly saw Poguli, I got surprised because I have seen it as "Pogali" only," but when I researched, I found that "Poguli" is also used. But as per WP:COMMONNAME, I prefer Pogali, because the majority of people search for that. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 16:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

@Uanfala and TheChunky: Another problem might be ISO code-related, iso639-3:hkh is created in early this year, but after that, several users (include me, indeed) added to and removed from this article, makes nearly everyone who edited this article touching 3RR line. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)