This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Nightscream, Infrogmation, and Phonograph record article
Nightscream and I seem to have some sort of conflict, which is certainly not anything I wish. In addition to what has been going on on here in the article and talk page, see my talk page at User_talk:Infrogmation#phonograph_record, where I am threatened with block. I hope discussion can be more cool and constructive - I strongly assert that whatever mistakes I might have made, NONE were intended to be "disruptive" nor *knowingly* violating policy, as I have been accused of. If any other parties interested in improving this article without personal dispute have suggestions I would welcome it; if this seems beyond the scope of resolution here, any thoughts on if I'd be better bringing this to other's attention at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard, or Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard, or perhaps some other Wikipedia forum. Thanks for your attention. -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
On further thought, I think we have two different issues here - Nighscream's issues with me attempting to edit are mostly off topic for talk page (possibly a Admin noticeboard issue). The other issue is improving this article - which is related to the first issue only in so far as I might be able to help in doing so without being blocked. A basic standard reference like "Tinfoil to Stereo" on hand can provide citations to many things. I guess all thoughts on improving this article need to be aired in detail on this talk page and consensus reached before editing the article? -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
I have had similar problems working with Nightscream. I don't think the problem is with us. If past behavior is any indicator, Nightscream will find a way to make it our problem. ~Kvng (talk) 23:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Your problem is your belief that you don't have to adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and the deliberate mendacity you exhibit in order to get away with this, including chickening out of answering when I debunk your arguments, as with the discussion right above this one. The evidence of your conduct to date, and the manner in which admins had explicitly closed discussions against your position, clearly indicates this. If this were not true, you'd be able to falsify it. You haven't, because you can't, and you're not honbest enough to admit this. Nightscream (talk) 14:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
My problem is my belief that I don't have to adhere to your interpretation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. As far as chickening out is concerned, I spent a fair amount of time answering your questions and explaining my position and interpretation of policy and, having done so, the conversation just abruptly stopped. I still don't know what to make of that but I WP:AGF and appreciate your efforts to improve the encyclopedia. ~Kvng (talk) 15:25, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
