Talk:Peptoid nanosheet

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 11 December 2013 by reviewer Arthur goes shopping (talk · contribs).

Biophysics (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biophysics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BiophysicsWikipedia:WikiProject BiophysicsTemplate:WikiProject BiophysicsBiophysics articles

Chemical and Bio Engineering (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemical and Bio Engineering, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Chemical and Bio EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringChemical and Bio Engineering articles

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Peptoid nanosheet as per WP:PLURAL and WP:NCCAPS. I recognize that this title was not proposed by anyone participating but it seems really open-and-shut to me. (non-admin closure) Red Slash 21:51, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nanosheets (peptoid) → Peptoid Nanosheets – I am actually the writer/creator of this page and I think it would sound/look a lot better if it was Peptoid Nanosheets. I would also help it not be confused with regular nanosheets. Clovela3 (talk) 23:11, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You'll want to propose Peptoid nanosheets; see WP:NCCAPS. --BDD (talk) 17:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree! Let's move it! --Theoneandonlyduncan (talk) 21:32, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.