Talk:Peanut butter and jelly sandwich/Archive 1

Preservation

Instead of trying to preserve bread for so long, why don't they use something like Melba toast (essentially stale bread) or some other cracker-like substance that preserves well? Nortexoid 05:59, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

In a bucket of ice —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monkeysaretheman (talk • contribs) 22:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

You know, people in the armed forces are ... well ... nuts. And believe me, Melba toast does not go well with peanut butter. It's not as stupid as the astronaut ice cream. -- Toytoy 06:06, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)

They have produced a shelf-stable bread for the MRE. It's quite dense and not wholly apropos for a PB&J. Can't imagine they haven't tried it, but they never ship PB and J in the same MRE. FYI. --Mmx1 00:50, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Controversy

The "controversy" section discusses a patent on a certain kind of sandwich, but the relevance to peanut butter and jelly, if there is any, is not clear. Unless this is cleared up, I will move that section to the article on Sandwiches. -- Dominus 22:37, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

But PB and jelly are so good and sandwiches in general are simply drab. I would never have come across such a ridiculous patent had it been on the sandwich article page. Moving it and providing a link on this article seems reasonable. I'm still taken aback from the patent controversy and it obviously indicates far greater concern for patent (US) laws.Nortexoid 02:40, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I agree the patent should remain linked from this article, since I think it is relevant and interesting. Perhaps there is actually enough information to make an Incredible Uncrustables article? - SCEhardt 04:20, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Umm... hate to say this but this is ridiculous!!! Controversy over a sandwich! what society has come to!!!Binglebongle2000 19:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Regions

The article states that:

those from many countries in Europe find the idea unappealing

Why is it more relevant what people in Europe think about this food than, say, people in Africa?

Do we really have evidence to make a such a strong statement anyway? Surveys, for example?

Are we going to attach similar statements to every food that is more popular in one place than another?

Geographical origin and distribution may be relevant, but "psychological reactions to the peanut butter and jelly sandwich by geographical region" is only a section for a far more detailed article than this one, and it certainly doesn't belong in the first sentence of the introduction.

Pekinensis 03:32, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

While it probably doesn't deserve to be in the introduction of the article, it's still an interesting fact nonetheless and deserves inclusion somewhere. But because we include it does not obligate us to include similar information for every demographic, location, race, etc.

A survey needn't be conducted to affirm that Europeans find the idea unappealing. We could likewise claim without conducting a survey to confirm it that Europeans find the idea of chopping young children into pieces and barbecuing them over burning bodies unappealing. The statement is a fact, not an opinion, and we are aiming to exclude the latter, not the former. Nortexoid 12:09, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Well, as a European (Or at least, English) I can confirm that I'm rather partial to Peanut butter and Jam (homemade, strawberry) on toast (homemade, crusty) Although I don't recall ever trying it on bread, per se, that's largely irrelevant. Perhaps a better statement to make would be something along the lines of, "PB&J Sandwiches are most popular in the US, and less so in Europe." Opinions? Fish-Face 23:05, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

And to counter you (as an english guy), I would like to raise the opinion that while Jam and Peanut Butter are both awesome sandwich or toast fillings on their own, I find the idea of mixing the two together horrid :/ --86.141.88.253 02:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

As another English person, seconded. 207.245.124.66 18:47, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

I apologize for my delay in responding.

My main objection is not that the statement about European tastes is an opinion, but that it is unverifiable.

I also find the statement unnotable, but feel less strongly about this.

Finally, I come back to the question of why we mention Europeans over any other group. It's not that I don't believe that there is a reason, it's that I'd like to state what it is, lest the article sound parochial.

Regards, Pekinensis 01:19, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This information would be better on the peanut butter page, pehaps reworked as trivia in regards to North American travelers having difficulty finding "their" peanut butter. As well, that page could have more on other cultures use of peanut butter as in a sause or soup. Glenlarson 05:57, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

You know, its probably more appropriate that instead of Europe, the wording be changed to the rest of the world. See, I live in Australia, and nobody I know has ever brought a PB and J sandwhich for lunch. I tried - I didnt like. The result amongst all of us seems to be its and American thing - much like vegimite is to us :PKokiri kid 06:49, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Although I am generally against the excessive focus on Western (America and Europe + NZ&Aus) ideas etc on wikipedia, in this case, I feel there might be grounds to include a statement (if it can be sourced/cited) related to European (or at least British) and NZ+Aus ideas of the peanut butter and jam sandwich but not other cultures. The reason is because sandwichs and toast, especially sandwichs and toast with peanut butter or jam is probably fairly normal in these cultures. However for many other African, Asian etc cultures, sandwichs and toast with peanut butter or jam is probably less common so it's less relevant (if most people find peanut butter or jam sandwichs/toast rather exotic or unusual then logically, their views on the combination are a lot less relevant) Nil Einne 00:36, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

This isn't scientific, but I confirm from polling my acquaintances that PB&J sandwich does not appeal to Franch taste... Then again, peanut butter is a relatively new product in France, even though it is easy to find in any decently stocked supermarket, or large enough minimarket. The habit here runs to jam spreads (that is, on a single slice of bread, toasted or not, with or without butter or substitute), and does not seem on the way of changing. The fact that it is not customary for schoolchildren to pack a lunch here may also be a factor. --Svartalf 02:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Peanut butter and jelly/jam

I know it used to be possible to purchase peanut butter and jelly spread in Malaysia which I'm pretty sure origated from the US (Scmuchers I believe). Surprisingly, this article only refers to applying peanut butter and jelly/jam on the sandwich. Is this scmuchers combination spread really that uncommon/unpopular that it doesn't deserve any mention? Nil Einne 00:40, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

jelly, jam, preserves

Some removed my mention of preserves, by saying preserves is a type of jam. That's not true. Preserves are what is made first from the fruit or berry, then with what's left over they make jam, then with what's left over from that process they finally make jelly. RJII 04:46, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm having trouble understanding how that works. Could you point me to a source explaining the process? Thanks -SCEhardT 06:17, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't know how the exact process works. I just read that that was the process in the Wall Street Journal once. But, if you don't believe that they are three different things, just check out a few links. [1] That they're three different things is obvious to anyone who buys the products. Some are labeled preserves, some labeled jam, and some labeled jelly --with the amount of fruit decreasing as you move down to jelly (along with the price). RJII 01:12, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying that! Sounds like we need to expand our related articles so that jam and preserves are different pages or at least distinguished from each other on the same page. -SCEhardT 01:54, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Whatever is done on that putative page needs to carefully distinguish American from British/Australian usage; American "jelly" is English "jam" and in England jam is a subset of preserves ... the references quoted are simply parochial in nature.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.131.200.92 (talk) 01:33, September 30, 2006 (UTC)

Unencyclopedic tone

Do we really need a borderline satirical blurb about possible errors in peanut butter and jelly making technique? This doesn't seem befitting of an encyclopedia, cutesy though it is. 68.154.225.38 19:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

I want to know who decided that "peanut butter and jelly sandwiches are often served with milk?" Is this a fact or an opinion? Maybe it's my region but I don't know of them to "often" be served with milk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbrobin (talk • contribs) 15:23, November 14, 2006 (UTC)

Types of bread

Instead of the usual types of bread used for making pb&j, I tend to use Brioche bread. It tastes really good. pinikas 10:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

might as well include cheese crackers Panochapower 22:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Aristocratic PB&J

Did a French Duchess really invent the peanut butter and jelly sandwich? Or is this another dubious Wikifactoid? User:Pedia-I/Signature

Origins

In regards to "The chief variant, however, is the plain peanut butter sandwich." surely the relationship is opposite, that PBJ is a variant of a peanut butter sandwich. It makes no sense to imply that the PBJ was the origin of all peanut butter sandwich ideas. Veridis 18:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

1940 as Year of First Mention in Print of PB&J?

The current Wikipedia article states that PB&J sandwiches were first mentioned in print in 1940.

However, note the below from the Los Angeles Metropolitan News-Enterprise of December 7, 2006:

“Peanut-butter-and-jelly sandwiches were first mentioned in print in 1940,” according to Wikipedia.com, an online enclopedia put together by a worldwide network of volunteers. That same information appears in Answers.com, Answers.yahoo.com, and other web sources.

“Both peanut butter and jelly were packed with United States Army K-rations in World War II,” the Wikipedia.com website continues. “The combination proved so popular that returning GIs made peanut butter and jelly a standard American food.”

It doesn’t happen to be true that no publications referred to peanut butter and jelly before 1940. Aside from the fact that 1940 pre-dated U.S. involvement in what was then “the War in Europe,” so there were not yet any World War II Army K-rations, peanut butter and jelly sandwiches went back decades, and mention of them did appear in print. However, once a fallacy appears on a website purporting to be a repository of facts, repetition is apt to occur, and recur, with the Internet functioning as a chamber of mirrors.

An article in the Nov. 16, 1915 edition of the Mansfield (Ohio) News, for example, recommends serving “two kinds of sandwiches in each luncheon,” one of the possibilities being “peanut butter and jelly.”

A column in the Jan. 3, 1919 edition of the Bridgeport (Conn.) Telegram advisises: “You must, try peanut butter and jelly, to know what a good sandwich filling it makes.”

A syndicated article appearing in the Wisconsin Rapids Daily Tribune on Nov. 11, 1932, mentions:

“There are pretty colored oil papers on the market with gay designs that will delight children. A good idea is to use ordinary oiled paper for the heavy sandwich, of meat or some substitute, and then wrap the jelly or peanut butter and jelly sandwich in this covering.”

I suspect this author used newspaperarchive.com as a research tool, or some such Internet-based resource offering an "advanced search" option. If the above can be confirm, then the claim in the the current Wikipedia article should be corrected. (Frankly, I think it's always risky to say that something "first appeared in print"; it's better to say that "the earliest known appearance in print dates to" or something like this, which contains a qualification.) --Skb8721 19:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

I have removed this information until it can be confirmed. -SCEhardT 22:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

It seems to be among the most important parts of this article to include its origins. Why not include it? --SidP (talk) 04:01, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Sandwich can last for three years ?

The current version of the article ([2]) says "The sandwich can survive in the field for up to three years". I find this rather hard to believe, so I think it needs some citation to support this affirmation. I think the affirmation came from the very first version of the article ([3]) where it says: "The US Department of Defense is researching ways of preserving a PBJ for up to 3 years for its combat troops in the field.", citing an article from Washington Times ([4]). Since 2003, that link is dead, but we can find it in the Wayback Machine: [5]. However the current phrase is rather different from the original phrase ("can survive" vs. "is reasearching ways of preserving") and this change was made more recently ([6]). Anyway, with or without rephrasing, the statement needs a citation. Razvan Socol 09:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, all MREs are supposed to last three years in cold storage, or one unrefrigerated. It might come from that. 199.76.157.35 10:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Europe, get with it! We do not put what the Europeans refer to as jelly on our sandwiches

I am an American and I am disgusted by the fact that Europeans think we put, using a brand name, Jell-O on our sandwiches. I was at school and I noticed this. Please help me get rid of the misinformation. Jelly usually refers to gelled fruit juices, and not the whole fruit as the term jam exists in USA. Edit: If I see jelly come back onto the page I will report this. It is misinformation and a hoax created by Europeans who do not understand what Americans refer to as jelly. --170.211.117.137 20:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Peanut butter on both pieces of bread?

I dispute the claim that putting peanut butter on both pieces of bread is the standard method. The simpliest and most common form is simply one layer of peanut butter and one layer of jelly. As a PB+J loving American, I've never seen or heard of the two-PB-layer variety before. Pimlottc 04:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. PB on one, J on the other, ensuring equitable distribution. If your jelly is seeping, you need to decrease your jelly or purchase better quality bread.199.76.157.35 10:03, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Well I can confirm that this method of creation does exist. I married someone who practices this method and comes from an entire family that puts PB on both sides of the bread. It is done so that it is "easier" to spread the jam. I do not subscribe to this method and it had lead to several arguments. Thankfully we have come to a compromise and "he who makes the sandwich gets to make it anyway they want, he who complains about the way the sandwich was made can make their own dam sandwich".

The only reason to spread peanut butter (PB) on both slices of bread is if you are going to use an equal amount of jelly (J) and save the sandwich for later. Failure to spread PB on both slices of bread will lead to the J seeping through the slice of bread which lacks the PB. If you are making a PB&J for instant consumption, then there is no need for PB on both slices of bread. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.19.132.126 (talk) 17:58, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Sealed crusted sandwiches

This section seems to go on a tangent unrelated to the rest of the article. Its also listed under shelf life, but probably is more properly described as a variation. Any thoughts? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.211.202.117 (talk) 05:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC).

Random sentence, vandalism?

I have no idea what this means: "For more info on how NOT to do things ask this kid Morgan Lee Emmet" But I've gone ahead and removed it as it seems to be some kind of vandalism... Gosh, forgot to sign my post. The above was me. Melissa Della 12:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

VARIATIONS...

not to be discounted are these two dont-knock-em-til-ya-tried-ems:

PNB & LETTUCE (ice berg, i havent tried any other variety) healthiest ive seen. we grew up on laura scudder's ("just peanuts & salt, that's all"). i find the brands that have added sugar (most of them) too sweet to be eaten with "j" or fruit.

PNB & MAYONNAISE (real, not miracle whip) quite tasty. for fat content, this might be as bad as it gets. how bad the fat is depends on whether its HYDROGENATED or not. hydrogenating vegetable oil produces TRIGLYCERIDES (complete or partial) & TRANS FAT (partial). neither REAL mayo nor NATURAL peanut butter have trans fats in them. peanut oil is mostly monounsaturated fat. mayonnaise is basically veg oil emulsified in egg yolk. fat from yolk is mostly unsaturated & a source of omega 3. mayo can be made/found with a variety of oils, all of which are mostly unsaturated (poly &/or mono) fat. EFAs (omega 3 & 6) come from polyunsaturated fat (flax, soy, canola, sunflower oils, etc). Panochapower 01:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

AMERICANS!!!! All they do is make fun of other cultures food and they have stranger tastes and worse meals than anybody else.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.233.178 (talk) 21:39, June 4, 2007 (UTC)

I have another one for you. Someone wrote jelly across the bottom of the screen numerous times probably just to tick the guy who wrote about the Jello-jelly controversy. It is strange and i am deleting it.Binglebongle2000 17:13, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Current version vs. older versions

The 14 August version of this article is far more informative than the current one. I understand that most of what has been removed is unsourced, but it would be far better for someone to come along and provide sources for it than for it to be deleted all together. Note that I also understand that an unsourced statement may be untrue; however, so might a sourced one, and in any case, all of the unsourced statements in the 14 August version of this article seem quite likely to be true as far as I can tell. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.238.69 (talk • contribs) 06:38, 28 August 2007

You are very welcome to restore anything you can locate a reliable source for. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:48, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

About the Constant Editing

It seems imperative that this article be kept in it's current condition- meaning the 'Popular Culture, Colloquialisms...' et cetera be kept. I see no reason to keep reverting this page back to such a bland, non-imaginative description of a sandwich. These types of sections can make seemingly useless articles interesting. Perhaps those who keep reverting the page could expand their minds and cease the revisions. --Good Day! -Buey 23:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm confused. Please explain the utility of: "This would mean that "uncrustables" are indeed a Peanut butter and jelly sandwich!" -SCEhardT 02:47, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

There is none that I can see. It's either obvious, wrong, or original research, in any case it doesn't belong here. Seems like it's obvious to me. The comment of the editor who added it (their only edit so far) suggests that it was only added to help win an argument (see here.) -- HiEv 09:03, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Trivia Section

The following section was removed for reasons I really don't understand. OK it's a trivia section. Wikipedia discourages trivia sections, so i just copied it here for future reference or inclusion to the article...

The sandwich has often been called, PB&J, Peanut Butter and J, Peanut Butter and Jam, Jammin' with Uncle Peanut Sam, or Blood and Mud (colloquial in Canada).

The TV series Family Guy has portrayed the dog Brian, dancing in a banana suit singing, "It's Peanut Butter Jelly Time!," a parody of Peanut Butter Jelly Time.

In the TV series Seinfeld, episode The Friars Club, Kramer came up with the idea for a restaurant called PB&J's, which would only serve peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. This idea actually came to fruition in 2005 when a restaurant by the same name opened in a Boston food court.

In "Fun Run," the first episode of season 4 of "The Office", Kevin makes a comment that Pam and Jim are perfect for each other, as proven by the fact that "Pam Beesly and Jim" can be abbreviated as "PB&J."

During his presidential campaign in 2000, President George W. Bush (then a candidate) revealed on The Oprah Winfrey Show that his favorite sandwich is peanut butter and jelly on white bread. pinikas (talk) 20:10, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

"Blood and mud"? In Canada you say? Never heard of it - please give a citation or region of origin. In our house, we call it PB&J, "peeb-age" or "la specialite de maison" (the last one when a child is getting it for disciplinary reasons). GBC (talk) 06:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

The Breakfast Club & Billy Joel

Doesn't John Bender refer to Brian's "PB & J with the crusts cut off" in the movie The Breakfast Club? If so this should be added to the In Popular Culture section. It's a very influential movie.

Also, isn't there a well-known story about Billy Joel saying "A peanut butter and jelly sandwich is better than bad sex"? I think this is mentioned on Billy Joel's biography page at the IMDb.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.217.224 (talk) 16:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Popular Culture, Colloquialisms and the PB&J

Adding on to this [subject^] section of the page.

Carnival Cruise Lines serves a toasted Peanut Butter and Jelly sandwich on its room service menu.

Source: Official Carnival Room Service Menu Thread http://boards.cruisecritic.com/showthread.php?t=359674

Jtoto 2002 (talk) 13:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 12:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Which flavor of jelly?

I wonder which flavor of jelly is commonly used ... --89.61.213.184 (talk) 17:16, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Grape, of course. --ScreaminEagle (talk) 15:54, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

I was thinking along these lines. The line "though most commonly dark berries (such as raspberry or blackberry) are used because of the flavor combination with peanut butter" is garbage here in the United States, where strawberry and concord grape jellies seem to dominate. I like apple myself, but that's irrelevant. (kevinthenerd - didn't bother to log in during lunch break) 65.161.183.226 (talk) 15:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Sounds like someone's having fun or has inserted his own opinions into the article. I've never heard of using dark berried jellies/jams within a PB&J. Not once. --ScreaminEagle (talk) 18:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Debatable coverage of the food groups

"With the addition of a glass of milk, a Peanut Butter and Jelly sandwich covers all of the food groups: starch (bread), protein (peanut), fruit (jelly), vegetable (jelly), and dairy (milk)." The jelly, I think, does not cover the food groups Fruit and Vegetables, if you look on a jelly label there is no vitamins or minerals and it is mostly sugar. This should be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stupid american (talk • contribs) 21:45, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Australian PB & J

I am Australian and i know of NO ONE who calls pb&j sandwiches Peanut Butter and Jam sandwiches... we use the American terminology simply because WE DO NO EAT pb&jam (or jelly for that matter) and often hear of it as jelly on the TV... we still call the fruit preserve jam (eg/ Strawberry Jam)but in the sandwiches case we call it Peanut Butter and Jelly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.188.149.134 (talk) 16:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

And here's a reference [7] Pol098 (talk) 17:03, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

I came to the talk page to dispute the article's claim that, in Australia, the term peanut butter and jam sandwich is used. It isn't, because this type of sandwich simply is not eaten here. Ever. My family (and I'd expect most Australians) find the idea (that we learn from US sitcoms), repulsive. Format (talk) 21:37, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

I removed it as uncited, I can find no evidence that these are commonly made, if at all, in Australia to warrant any reference. The only use I can recall seeing is The Amazing Mumford on Seasame Street using it as his magic word.Number36 (talk) 04:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Popular culture.

I would like to add new information to this article regarding popular culture. Since 2001 my friends and I have celebrated PB&J day on July 9th. We have a facebook group which describes our motives behind this little celebration and we have lots of supporters. In this request I would like to officially invite any and all of you interested to join the aforementioned facebook group at [8]. Also I would like to formally and respectfully request the administrators to allow me to contribute to this article. If there are any further questions, or comments regarding my request. Please e-mail me at [9]. I thank you in advanced for you interest and cooperation. Camagitoe (talk) 00:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Please consider adding: The original release of the Jefferson Airplane's album Volunteers (1969) had a fold-out album cover (discontinued in later releases) that used as its centerfold an oversized photograph of a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.

image: http://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-media/product-gallery/B000002X4T/ref=cm_ciu_pdp_images_0?ie=UTF8&index=0 (I know you can't use the image. I include the link in support of my assertion.)

Volunteers: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volunteers_(Jefferson_Airplane_album) (Note that the last two lines in the production notes reproduced in the entry are "PB & J photo: Little Herbie Greene" and "PB & J: Eaten by Gut.")

The matter of the pb&j centerfold is discussed in the book Got a Revolution!: The Turbulent Flight of Jefferson Airplane (Atria, 2005, ISBN 978-0671034047), by Jeff Tamarkin, Jann Wenner, and Paul Kantner, on page 209:

...[T]he interior of the foldout cover revealed an oversized peanut butter and jelly sandwich, photographed by Herbie Greene. The actual sandwich was later eaten by Gut, an ex-Hell's Angel and manager of the hard rock band Blue Cheer who, along with one Milton Burke and an uncredited Gary Blackman, designed the cover.

MARTY BALIN: I personally hated that cover. I had no idea why they would put a peanut butter and jelly sandwich on there. I guess they thought it was funny.

Google Book Search link to that page: http://books.google.com/books?id=TKyYNB0pGIoC&pg=PA209&lpg=PA209&dq=volunteers+peanut+butter+jelly+jefferson&source=bl&ots=q70unlGqvE&sig=370sERgeCwQ3CcwqrSVG2qADJpY&hl=en&ei=43GgSefvDMK4-QaSpaW2Dg&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result#PPA209,M1

The book itself, on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Got-Revolution-Turbulent-Jefferson-Airplane/dp/0671034049/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1235252639&sr=8-1

Subversive food aid

I'm sorry I don't have sources to hand to back this up, but I swear I didn't just make this up: America dropped tons and tons of sliced white bread, penut butter and jam/jelly/whatever out of aeroplanes onto the starving and freezing former commies when the USSR collapsed. Of course it might have been simpler and kinder to drop traditional food aid like sacks of grain, tinned meat (or whatever normally gets dropped on starving people), but Uncle Sam couldn't resist the opportunity to spread the good word of 'Freeman Mocracy' through the medium of PB&J ingredients. Was this a good humoured act of embracing kindness or an act of savage culinary imperialism? Discuss.

If someone has time to dig out a reference and some dates for this, it definitely ought to go into the article IMO. Traveller palm (talk) 17:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Paul Kolvenbach

According to the article Paul Kolvenbach is the "unofficial, official inventor of the PB&J delight". However, the cited article doesn't appear to back up this claim. Is this vandalism? Tweisbach (talk) 08:38, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

I removed it, since, as you say, the references don't back it up. Also, the writing style is unencyclopedic. Huw Powell (talk) 02:44, 14 July 2010 (UTC)